Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
Published on: October 3, 2025
Protein social behavior makes a stronger signal for partner identification than surface geometry
Elodie Laine1, Alessandra Carbone1,2
1Sorbonne Universités, UPMC-Univ P6, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative - UMR 7238, Paris, 75005, France.
Abstract:
Cells are interactive living systems where proteins movements, interactions and regulation are substantially free from centralized management. How protein physico-chemical and geometrical properties determine who interact with whom remains far from fully understood. We show that characterizing how a protein behaves with many potential interactors in a complete cross-docking study leads to a sharp identification of its cellular/true/native partner(s). We define a sociability index, or S-index, reflecting whether a protein likes or not to pair with other proteins. Formally, we propose a suitable normalization function that accounts for protein sociability and we combine it with a simple interface-based (ranking) score to discriminate partners from non-interactors. We show that sociability is an important factor and that the normalization permits to reach a much higher discriminative power than shape complementarity docking scores. The social effect is also observed with more sophisticated docking algorithms. Docking conformations are evaluated using experimental binding sites. These latter approximate in the best possible way binding sites predictions, which have reached high accuracy in recent years. This makes our analysis helpful for a global understanding of partner identification and for suggesting discriminating strategies. These results contradict previous findings claiming the partner identification problem being solvable solely with geometrical docking. Proteins 2016; 85:137-154. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals
Relationship Formation
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

