Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice
Andrew R Chapman1, Philip D Adamson1, Nicholas L Mills1
1BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Insights
Myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction are common in hospitalized patients, affecting over a third and leading to poor outcomes. Identifying coronary artery disease in these cases may improve patient prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Biomedical Science
Background:
- Myocardial injury is frequent in patients without acute coronary syndrome.
- Current guidelines classify myocardial infarction by etiology, distinguishing type 1 (plaque rupture) from type 2 (supply-demand imbalance).
- Myocardial injury without ischemia is classified as acute or chronic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the challenges and implications of classifying myocardial infarction, particularly type 2.
- To highlight the prevalence and poor outcomes associated with myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction.
- To emphasize the potential benefit of considering coronary artery disease in type 2 myocardial infarction.
Main Methods:
- Review of current international guidelines on myocardial infarction classification.
- Analysis of the diagnostic criteria and clinical implications of type 2 myocardial infarction.
- Discussion of the prognostic impact of myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction.
Main Results:
- Type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury affect over one-third of hospitalized patients.
- These conditions are associated with significantly poor short-term and long-term outcomes, with a 5-year mortality rate of two-thirds.
- The current classification system faces challenges in practical adoption due to diagnostic ambiguity and uncertain implications.
Conclusions:
- The classification of myocardial infarction is evolving, with future guidelines likely to emphasize coronary artery disease identification in type 2 myocardial infarction.
- Clinicians should investigate potential contributions of coronary artery disease to myocardial injury.
- Targeted secondary prevention in selected patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and underlying coronary artery disease may improve outcomes.
Abstract:
Myocardial injury is common in patients without acute coronary syndrome, and international guidelines recommend patients with myocardial infarction are classified by aetiology. The universal definition differentiates patients with myocardial infarction due to plaque rupture (type 1) from those due to myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance (type 2) secondary to other acute illnesses. Patients with myocardial necrosis, but no symptoms or signs of myocardial ischaemia, are classified as acute or chronic myocardial injury. This classification has not been widely adopted in practice, because the diagnostic criteria for type 2 myocardial infarction encompass a wide range of presentations, and the implications of the diagnosis are uncertain. However, both myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction are common, occurring in more than one-third of all hospitalised patients. These patients have poor short-term and long-term outcomes with two-thirds dead in 5 years. The classification of patients with myocardial infarction continues to evolve, and future guidelines are likely to recognise the importance of identifying coronary artery disease in type 2 myocardial infarction. Clinicians should consider whether coronary artery disease has contributed to myocardial injury, as selected patients are likely to benefit from further investigation and in these patients targeted secondary prevention has the potential to improve outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment


