Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026
Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
Patient-related quality assurance with different combinations of treatment planning systems, techniques, and machines
Beatrice Steiniger1, René Berger2, Sabine Eilzer3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany. beatrice.steiniger@med.uni-jena.de.
Purpose:
This project compares the different patient-related quality assurance systems for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques currently used in the central Germany area with an independent measuring system.
Materials And Methods:
The participating institutions generated 21 treatment plans with different combinations of treatment planning systems (TPS) and linear accelerators (LINAC) for the QUASIMODO (Quality ASsurance of Intensity MODulated radiation Oncology) patient model. The plans were exposed to the ArcCHECK measuring system (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, USA). The dose distributions were analyzed using the corresponding software and a point dose measured at the isocenter with an ionization chamber.
Results:
According to the generally used criteria of a 10 % threshold, 3 % difference, and 3 mm distance, the majority of plans investigated showed a gamma index exceeding 95 %. Only one plan did not fulfill the criteria and three of the plans did not comply with the commonly accepted tolerance level of ±3 % in point dose measurement.
Conclusion:
Using only one of the two examined methods for patient-related quality assurance is not sufficiently significant in all cases.
