Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
Published on: July 11, 2016
Comparing culture and molecular methods for the identification of microorganisms involved in necrotizing soft tissue
Vibeke Børsholt Rudkjøbing1, Trine Rolighed Thomsen1,2, Yijuan Xu1,2
1Center for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Background:
Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are a group of infections affecting all soft tissues. NSTI involves necrosis of the afflicted tissue and is potentially life threatening due to major and rapid destruction of tissue, which often leads to septic shock and organ failure. The gold standard for identification of pathogens is culture; however molecular methods for identification of microorganisms may provide a more rapid result and may be able to identify additional microorganisms that are not detected by culture.
Methods:
In this study, tissue samples (n = 20) obtained after debridement of 10 patients with NSTI were analyzed by standard culture, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and multiple molecular methods. The molecular methods included analysis of microbial diversity by 1) direct 16S and D2LSU rRNA gene Microseq 2) construction of near full-length 16S rRNA gene clone libraries with subsequent Sanger sequencing for most samples, 3) the Ibis T5000 biosensor and 4) 454-based pyrosequencing. Furthermore, quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to verify and determine the relative abundance of Streptococcus pyogenes in samples.
Results:
For 70 % of the surgical samples it was possible to identify microorganisms by culture. Some samples did not result in growth (presumably due to administration of antimicrobial therapy prior to sampling). The molecular methods identified microorganisms in 90 % of the samples, and frequently detected additional microorganisms when compared to culture. Although the molecular methods generally gave concordant results, our results indicate that Microseq may misidentify or overlook microorganisms that can be detected by other molecular methods. Half of the patients were found to be infected with S. pyogenes, but several atypical findings were also made including infection by a) Acinetobacter baumannii, b) Streptococcus pneumoniae, and c) fungi, mycoplasma and Fusobacterium necrophorum.
Conclusion:
The study emphasizes that many pathogens can be involved in NSTIs, and that no specific "NSTI causing" combination of species exists. This means that clinicians should be prepared to diagnose and treat any combination of microbial pathogens. Some of the tested molecular methods offer a faster turnaround time combined with a high specificity, which makes supplemental use of such methods attractive for identification of microorganisms, especially for fulminant life-threatening infections such as NSTI.
Insights
Molecular methods rapidly identify diverse pathogens in necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs), detecting more microorganisms than traditional culture. This aids clinicians in diagnosing and treating these life-threatening conditions effectively.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are severe, rapidly progressing infections with high mortality.
- Traditional culture methods for pathogen identification can be slow and may miss certain microorganisms.
- Molecular diagnostic techniques offer potential for faster and more comprehensive microbial identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of standard culture with various molecular methods for identifying pathogens in NSTI tissue samples.
- To assess the speed and accuracy of different molecular techniques in detecting a broad range of microorganisms.
- To identify common and atypical pathogens involved in NSTI cases.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 20 tissue samples from 10 NSTI patients using standard culture and multiple molecular methods (Microseq, clone libraries, Ibis T5000, 454-pyrosequencing).
- Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to determine the relative abundance of Streptococcus pyogenes.
- Comparison of pathogen detection rates and types between culture and molecular approaches.
Main Results:
- Molecular methods identified microorganisms in 90% of samples, compared to 70% for culture.
- Molecular techniques frequently detected additional pathogens missed by culture, with some discrepancies between methods (e.g., Microseq).
- Identified pathogens included Streptococcus pyogenes, Acinetobacter baumannii, Streptococcus pneumoniae, fungi, mycoplasma, and Fusobacterium necrophorum.
Conclusions:
- NSTIs can be caused by a wide array of pathogens, with no single consistent combination.
- Clinicians must be prepared to diagnose and treat diverse microbial profiles in NSTI.
- Rapid molecular methods are valuable adjuncts for identifying pathogens in life-threatening infections like NSTI.
More Related Videos
11:25Preparation of a Blood Culture Pellet for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Published on: October 15, 2014
09:07Author Spotlight: Accelerating Diagnostic Accuracy with Direct Identification of Gram-Negatives from Blood Culture Bottles
Published on: May 24, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Classification and Identification
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Differential Staining Technique
Key Techniques in Microbiology
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods