Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Introduction of blended learning in a master program: Developing an integrative mixed method evaluation framework.
Aviva S Chmiel1, Maya Shaha1, Daniel K Schneider2
1Institute of Higher Education and Research in Nursing (IUFRS), Switzerland.
A new evaluation framework for higher education blended learning (BL) programs was developed, involving all stakeholders. While effective, this comprehensive approach requires significant resources, prompting further refinement for efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Educational technology
- Higher education pedagogy
- Program evaluation
Background:
- Current blended learning (BL) evaluations in higher education are fragmented, focusing on isolated aspects like students, faculty, technology, or institutions.
- A validated, comprehensive tool for monitoring BL implementation in higher education is currently lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and implement a comprehensive evaluation framework for higher education blended learning (BL) programs.
- To involve all key actors (students, faculty, administration) in the evaluation process.
- To identify strengths and weaknesses of BL implementation.
Main Methods:
- Established evaluation principles and standards were used to identify and group key concepts for evaluation.
- Existing BL evaluation tools at student, faculty, and institutional levels were reviewed and selected.
- The developed framework was implemented to monitor BL during two program iterations.
Main Results:
- The evaluation successfully documented comprehensive strengths and weaknesses of the BL format, incorporating feedback from all involved actors.
- The findings led to specific improvements at the program, faculty, and course levels.
- The evaluation process and reporting demanded significant time and personal resources.
Conclusions:
- The developed framework effectively measures critical dimensions influencing BL success at the program level.
- The comprehensive nature of the evaluation is resource-intensive.
- Future work will focus on refining the framework into a sustainable and transferable BL monitoring tool balancing comprehensiveness and efficiency.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Nursing Evaluation

