Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
912
[The Heidelberg CI database module : Quality control in hearing restoration with cochlear implants].
I T Herisanu1,2, S Hoth2, M Praetorius3
1Universitäts-Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Universität Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
HNO
|November 13, 2016
Summary
A new database module aids in managing cochlear implant (CI) patient data. This system facilitates analysis of patient demographics, hearing status, and outcomes, improving data assessment for CI care.
Area of Science:
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Cochlear implants (CI) are the standard treatment for profound deafness.
- Growing CI patient numbers necessitate efficient data management.
- Database systems enhance data assessment for physicians, insurers, and researchers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and present a specialized database module for cochlear implant patient data.
- To evaluate the module's utility through analysis of 100 patient cases.
Main Methods:
- A custom database module was developed in collaboration with Innoforce Est.
- Data from 100 cochlear implant patients were collected and analyzed.
- Key features of the module and sample data analysis are presented.
Main Results:
- The cohort included 100 patients (50 male, 50 female) aged 1-87 years, with a peak in the 51-60 age group.
- Over 50% had contralateral severe hearing impairment, meeting CI criteria.
- Most patients experienced functional deafness for over 20 years prior to CI; 67 showed positive preoperative electrical stimulation.
- All 100 patients reported auditory sensations post-CI.
Conclusions:
- The patient cohort is representative of those at Heidelberg University Medical Center and aligns with literature demographics.
- Contralateral ear status is expected given CI's relative novelty.
- Preoperative electrical stimulation alone was not a significant predictor.
- The database facilitated straightforward calculation of hearing outcomes and complications compared to standard systems.

