Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tox21mer, A transformer foundation model for Tox21 high-throughput concentration-response curves data.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven morphological assessment of zebrafish larvae for developmental toxicity chemical screening.

Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Simulation methodologies to determine statistical power in laboratory animal research studies.

Laboratory animals·2024
Same author

ToxicR: A computational platform in R for computational toxicology and dose-response analyses.

Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2023
Same author

Oral deoxynivalenol toxicity in Harlan Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley® SD®) rat dams and their offspring.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2021
Same author

Butylparaben multigenerational reproductive assessment by continuous breeding in Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats following dietary exposure.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 12, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes
09:44

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

Published on: March 3, 2015

10.0K

Minimizing Systematic Errors in Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data Using Standardization, Background

Mitas Ray1, Keith Shockley2, Grace Kissling2

  • 1William G. Enloe High School, 128 Clarendon Crescent, Raleigh, NC 27610.

The Journal of Experimental Secondary Science
|November 15, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) generates large datasets for toxicity testing. A new LNLO normalization method effectively removes systematic errors, improving data reliability for chemical toxicity assessment.

More Related Videos

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.9K
Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

18.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 12, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes
09:44

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

Published on: March 3, 2015

10.0K
Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.9K
Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

18.9K

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Assay Development

Background:

  • Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) offers efficient chemical testing.
  • Raw qHTS data contain systematic errors (row, column, cluster, edge effects).
  • Accurate toxicity assessment requires robust data normalization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a novel normalization method for qHTS data.
  • To address systematic errors within and between experiments.
  • To improve the reliability of toxicity data from qHTS assays.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a combined linear (LN) and local weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS or LO) normalization method (LNLO).
  • Applied LN normalization to minimize row and column effects.
  • Applied LOESS normalization to minimize cluster effects.
  • Utilized heat maps for visual assessment of normalization effectiveness.

Main Results:

  • The LNLO method demonstrated superior performance in removing systematic errors compared to LN or LO alone.
  • Heat maps visually confirmed the enhanced error removal by LNLO.
  • The method was validated on an estrogen receptor agonist assay dataset from the Tox21 collaboration.

Conclusions:

  • The LNLO normalization method is effective for improving qHTS data quality.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of toxicity predictions from high throughput screening.
  • The method has significant implications for toxicological testing and chemical safety assessment.