Implementation of a Risk Stratification and Management Pathway for Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department

Christopher W Baugh1, Jeffrey O Greenberg, Simon A Mahler

  • 1From the *Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; †Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; ‡Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; §Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and ¶Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Insights

Implementing a Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) for chest pain did not improve outcomes but increased emergency department length of stay. Poor adherence, due to lack of confidence in the tool, led to prolonged stays without clinical benefit.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Pathways

Background:

  • Chest pain is a frequent emergency department complaint, with a subset representing acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
  • Variations in diagnostic workup, risk stratification, and management can lead to inefficient resource utilization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the implementation of a Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) for chest pain, based on the HEART score.
  • To assess the impact of SCAMP adherence on diagnostic workup, resource utilization, and patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective cohort study was conducted implementing a SCAMP for chest pain.
  • Data collected included adherence to the SCAMP algorithm, reasons for deviation, troponin timing, stress test utilization, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day adverse events (revascularization, ACS, death).

Main Results:

  • Among 97 patients in the SCAMP pathway, low-risk patients showed poor adherence to troponin testing (56% not followed) and stress testing (11% received tests contrary to recommendations).
  • Deviations from SCAMP in low- and intermediate-risk patients did not result in additional clinical benefit but significantly prolonged emergency department LOS.
  • Lack of confidence in the SCAMP tool was the primary reason cited for non-compliance.

Conclusions:

  • Compliance with SCAMP recommendations for low- and intermediate-risk chest pain patients was suboptimal, primarily due to low confidence in the tool.
  • Deviation from the SCAMP pathway in this study population did not yield additional clinical benefit and was associated with significantly longer emergency department LOS.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care01:28

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
374
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management01:26

Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management

Nursing Assessment:Nursing management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) involves taking the patient's history, focusing on primary complaints such as chest pain, dyspnea, and excessive sweating (diaphoresis), as well as other symptoms like back or jaw pain, nausea, vomiting, palpitations, dizziness, and fatigue. The nurse also reviews the patient's history of cardiac events, risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, family history, and current medications.In the objective assessment,...
450
Angina V: Nursing Management01:20

Angina V: Nursing Management

Angina, a symptom of myocardial ischemia, requires a structured nursing management approach to ensure effective care and prevent complications like myocardial infarction. Comprehensive nursing care involves assessing, diagnosing, planning, implementing interventions, and evaluating outcomes, all tailored to the individual patient's needs.Patient AssessmentNursing assessment begins with a detailed subjective evaluation of symptoms, which typically include chest pain or pressure radiating to the...
466
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) encompasses a spectrum of heart conditions caused by sudden obstruction of coronary arteries, typically resulting from the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque and subsequent thrombus (blood clot) formation. This obstruction can lead to partial or complete blockage of blood flow, causing varying degrees of myocardial ischemia or infarction.ACS includes the following clinical entities:Unstable Angina (UA)Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)ST-Elevation...
1.4K
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
362
Flail Chest-II01:26

Flail Chest-II

Managing flail chest, a condition characterized by a segment of the chest wall moving independently from the rest of the thoracic cage, requires a comprehensive approach. It includes a thorough assessment of the patient's condition, a diagnostic evaluation to determine the extent of the injury, and the implementation of appropriate medical interventions tailored to the individual's needs.
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
812