Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Zebra II as A Novel System to Record Electrophysiological Signals in Zebrafish
Published on: August 16, 2024
Interactions of digitalis and class-III antiarrhythmic drugs: Amiodarone versus dronedarone
Gerrit Frommeyer1, Dirk Puckhaber1, Christian Ellermann1
1Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Background:
A post hoc analysis of the PALLAS trial suggested possible interactions of dronedarone and digitalis glycosides. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects dronedarone or amiodarone in combination with digitalis glycosides.
Methods And Results:
Eleven female rabbits underwent chronic oral treatment with amiodarone (50mg/kg/d for 6weeks). Ten rabbits were treated with dronedarone (50mg/kg/d for 6weeks). Ten rabbits were used as controls. Hearts were isolated and Langendorff-perfused. Monophasic action potentials and ECG showed a moderate prolongation of QT interval and action potential duration (APD). Both drugs also increased effective refractory period. Additional application of ouabain (0.2μM) resulted in a significant decrease of QT interval, APD, and ERP in all groups. Ventricular arrhythmias were induced by programmed ventricular stimulation and aggressive burst stimulation. Reproducible occurrence was defined as occurrence of at least 3 episodes. Under baseline conditions in control hearts, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was inducible in 1 of 10 hearts (7 episodes). After the application of 0.2μM ouabain, 4 of 10 control hearts were inducible (24 episodes). One of 10 dronedarone-pretreated hearts (3 episodes) and 2 of 11 amiodarone-pretreated hearts (6 episodes) showed VF before ouabain infusion. After the application of 0.2μM ouabain, 7 of 10 dronedarone-pretreated hearts were inducible (73 episodes). By contrast, only 4 of 11 amiodarone-pretreated hearts (13 episodes) showed VF.
Conclusion:
In the present study, additional treatment with ouabain resulted in an increased ventricular vulnerability in al study groups. Of note, chronically dronedarone-pretreated hearts were significantly more vulnerable than amiodarone-pretreated hearts.
More Related Videos
10:41Laser-Induced Action Potential-Like Measurements of Cardiomyocytes on Microelectrode Arrays for Increased Predictivity of Safety Pharmacology
Published on: September 13, 2022
07:42Contractions of Human-iPSC-derived Cardiomyocyte Syncytia Measured with a Ca-sensitive Fluorescent Dye in Temperature-controlled 384-well Plates
Published on: October 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...