Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact on airborne isolation duration utilizing GeneXpert versus acid-fast bacilli smears to guide discontinuation among individuals with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

The Association of Preoperative Patient Resilience With Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Resection Outcomes According to Pathologic Risk in ≤2 cm Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

Structural Insights Into the Function of Leishmania major Adenylosuccinate Lyase.

Proteins·2026
Same author

Practice variation, outcomes and definitions of suppressive antimicrobial therapy for prosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and expert consensus statement.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same author

Survivorship of modern total hip replacement to 30 years: systematic review, meta-analysis, and extrapolation of global joint registry data.

Lancet (London, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Clinical Application of Microscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
04:42

Clinical Application of Microscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 16, 2023

1.2K

Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Current Trends in the Spine Literature.

Andrew S Chung1, Anne G Copay2, Neil Olmscheid1

  • 1University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Orthopedic Surgery Residency, Phoenix, AZ.

Spine
|November 22, 2016
PubMed
Summary

The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is inconsistently applied in spine literature, leading to confusion. Further standardization is needed for reliable patient outcome interpretation in clinical practice.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
07:44

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2019

19.0K
Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

761

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Clinical Application of Microscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
04:42

Clinical Application of Microscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 16, 2023

1.2K
Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
07:44

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2019

19.0K
Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

761

Area of Science:

  • Spine research
  • Clinical outcomes assessment
  • Patient-reported outcomes

Background:

  • Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest beneficial change for patients or clinicians.
  • Inconsistent MCID calculations and usage create confusion in interpreting patient outcomes.
  • Variability in MCID values complicates its application in clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize MCID determinations and analyze its application in spine literature (2011-2015).
  • To provide a reference for practitioners interpreting and utilizing MCID.
  • To identify inconsistencies in MCID usage and calculation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of spine literature from 2011 to 2015.
  • Inclusion of clinical science articles using patient-reported outcome scores (PROs).
  • Keyword search for MCID utilization and characterization of its application.

Main Results:

  • MCID was referenced in 16.6% of eligible articles.
  • 8.3% calculated MCID independently; 59.1% used existing MCID values.
  • Significant variability in MCID values (two- to three-fold range) and reliance on generic MCID were observed.

Conclusions:

  • Despite interest, MCID development and application in spine literature are inconsistent.
  • Current MCID usage lacks standardization, impacting reliable interpretation of patient improvement.
  • Further research is needed to refine MCID calculation and application for clinical utility.