Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

557
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
557
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

384
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
384
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

344
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
344
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

411
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
411
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

854
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
854
Adjusting a Traverse01:12

Adjusting a Traverse

417
In the site survey of a four-sided traverse, internal angles are essential to ensure geometric accuracy. The survey revealed that the sum of the measured internal angles was 359 degrees and 48 minutes, which is 12 minutes less than the expected 360 degrees. This discrepancy signals an error likely arising from measurement inaccuracies during the fieldwork.To rectify this error, the adjustment process involved distributing the 12-minute shortfall equally across the four internal angles. By...
417

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring the Importance and Performance Priorities of Older Adults With a User-Centred Approach to Create a Fall-Free Bathroom.

International journal of older people nursing·2024
Same author

Activity Recognition Invariant to Wearable Sensor Unit Orientation Using Differential Rotational Transformations Represented by Quaternions.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2018
Same author

Activity Recognition Invariant to Sensor Orientation with Wearable Motion Sensors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2017
Same author

Localization and Tracking of Implantable Biomedical Sensors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2017
Same author

Automated evaluation of physical therapy exercises using multi-template dynamic time warping on wearable sensor signals.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2014
Same author

Detecting falls with wearable sensors using machine learning techniques.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2014
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K

Objective Error Criterion for Evaluation of Mapping Accuracy Based on Sensor Time-of-Flight Measurements.

Billur Barshan1

  • 1Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Bilkent 06800 Ankara, Turkey. billur@ee.bilkent.edu.tr.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new objective error criterion evaluates map accuracy from range measurements. This method is versatile for various sensing modalities and mapping techniques, offering a flexible assessment tool.

Keywords:
Hausdorff metricautonomous robotserror criterionlaser range findersmap errorsmappingmedian errorrange sensingtime-of-flight measurementsultrasonic sensing

More Related Videos

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

17.4K
Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K
Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

17.4K
Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics and Sensor Technology
  • Geomatics and Cartography

Background:

  • Accurate mapping of unknown environments is crucial for robotics and autonomous systems.
  • Evaluating map accuracy from diverse sensing modalities and processing techniques presents a significant challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel, objective error criterion for assessing the accuracy of environment maps.
  • To provide a flexible tool for evaluating the goodness of fit for curves and shapes within map data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a generalized objective error criterion for map accuracy assessment.
  • Experimental validation using ultrasonic mapping with time-of-flight measurements.
  • Comparison of the proposed criterion against established metrics like the Hausdorff metric and median error.

Main Results:

  • The proposed criterion effectively evaluates map accuracy from range measurements.
  • Demonstrated applicability to discrete point maps from various sensing modalities and processing techniques.
  • Experimental results show comparable and complementary performance to existing metrics.

Conclusions:

  • The developed error criterion offers a general and flexible approach to map accuracy evaluation.
  • It is suitable for diverse mapping applications, including those employing different sensors and algorithms.
  • This criterion enhances the reliability of map-based navigation and analysis in unknown environments.