Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mass Spectrometry of Amines01:15

Mass Spectrometry of Amines

5.4K
In mass spectroscopy, amines undergo fragmentation to give parent ions with odd molecule weights. This observed mass spectrum follows the nitrogen rule; a molecule with an odd number of nitrogen atoms produces a molecular ion with an odd molecular weight. Amines undergo fragmentation through α cleavage, producing nitrogen-containing cations—iminium ions—and alkyl radicals. Mass spectra of aromatic and cyclic aliphatic amines exhibit strong molecular ion peaks, but acyclic...
5.4K
Mass Spectrometry: Overview01:19

Mass Spectrometry: Overview

9.0K
Mass spectrometry is an analytical technique used to determine the molecular mass and molecular formula of a compound. The basic principle of mass spectrometry is to generate ions from the analyte molecule and measure these ion abundances against their molecular mass. One common type of ionization, known as electron ionization or EI, bombards the analyte molecules in the gas phase with high-energy electron beams. The electron beams displace an electron from the molecule and leave behind a...
9.0K
Mass Spectrometry: Isotope Effect01:13

Mass Spectrometry: Isotope Effect

4.3K
Most elements exist in nature as a mixture of isotopes. The isotopes differ in weight due to their respective number of neutrons. The molecular weight of a molecule is different depending on the specific isotope of its elements involved. As a result, the mass spectrum of the molecule exhibits peaks from the same fragment at multiple positions. The positions of these mass signals depend on the mass differences between isotopes. Furthermore, the intensity of these signals is dependent on the...
4.3K
Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:21

Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2.6K
Tandem mass spectrometry is a technique that uses multiple mass analyzers in series to obtain a higher selectivity and reduce chemical noise during analyte detection. Instruments with multiple analyzers separated by an interaction cell enable secondary fragmentation and selected study of the fragment ions.Secondary fragmentations occur in the interaction cell and can be induced by various factors. Fragmentation induced by collision with inert gases, such as N2, Ar, He, etc., is called...
2.6K
Chemical Ionization (CI) Mass Spectrometry01:21

Chemical Ionization (CI) Mass Spectrometry

1.6K
The molecular ion peak of a molecule in the mass spectrum provides vital information for molecular identification. However, conventional electron impact ionization can lead to the rapid dissociation of some molecular ions before they reach the detector. A milder ionization method is required to increase the lifetime of such ionized analyte molecules. Chemical ionization (CI) is a gas-phase protonation reaction useful for mass-analyzing analyte molecules that are easily protonated to yield the...
1.6K
Mass Spectrometry: Alkene Fragmentation00:59

Mass Spectrometry: Alkene Fragmentation

3.7K
Alkenes lose one electron from the unsaturated π bond upon ionization and form stable molecular ions. Further fragmentation of alkenes occurs through three different reaction pathways. The most prominent fragmentation is the cleavage at the allylic position. The resultant allylic carbocation is resonance stabilized. In the mass spectra of terminal alkenes, this fragment appears at a mass-to-charge ratio of 41. In the internal alkenes, where there are two choices of allylic cleavage, the...
3.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative Measurement of Hexoses by Betaine Aldehyde Derivatisation.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Liver and Kidney Tissues Under Opioid Exposure: Rewriting and Old Story Through Proteomics and MALDI-MSI.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

The diversity of cellular systems involved in carbonate precipitation by Escherichia coli.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Can the Quality of Semen Affect the Fertilisation Indices of Turkey Eggs?

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Structural perspective on the design of selective DYRK1B inhibitors.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2025
Same author

Assessing Label Stability in Oligopeptide-Modified Polymer Filament for Advanced Materials: Ultraviolet Exposure and Biodegradation Study.

ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

A Plasma Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry using an Automated Workstation
07:12

A Plasma Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry using an Automated Workstation

Published on: April 24, 2020

10.6K

Protocol: MYTHBUSTERS: a universal procedure for sample preparation for mass spectrometry.

Anna Drabik1, Joanna Ner-Kluza2, Anna Bodzon-Kulakowska2

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Neurobiology, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland. drabik@agh.edu.pl.

European Journal of Mass Spectrometry (Chichester, England)
|November 25, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Protein extraction methods significantly impact proteomic analysis reproducibility. Optimizing sample preparation, including homogenization buffers, is crucial for accurate identification of aptamer-binding partners in cancer cells.

More Related Videos

Sample Preparation for Probe Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry
05:47

Sample Preparation for Probe Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Published on: February 19, 2020

10.0K
Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-based Identification of RNA-binding Regions
10:52

Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-based Identification of RNA-binding Regions

Published on: September 28, 2017

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

A Plasma Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry using an Automated Workstation
07:12

A Plasma Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry using an Automated Workstation

Published on: April 24, 2020

10.6K
Sample Preparation for Probe Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry
05:47

Sample Preparation for Probe Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Published on: February 19, 2020

10.0K
Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-based Identification of RNA-binding Regions
10:52

Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-based Identification of RNA-binding Regions

Published on: September 28, 2017

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Protein extraction is critical for high-quality proteomic analysis.
  • Existing methods vary, and no single protocol captures the entire proteome due to protein diversity.
  • Lack of reproducibility in proteomic studies often stems from variations in protein extraction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different protein extraction methods on proteomic analysis.
  • To identify aptamer-binding partners in cancerous cells using mass spectrometry.
  • To highlight the importance of sample preparation, specifically homogenization and extraction, for reproducibility.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized various protein extraction protocols with slight modifications to homogenization buffers.
  • Analyzed complex biological samples from cancerous cells using mass spectrometry.
  • Identified aptamer-binding partners.

Main Results:

  • Different protein extraction methods led to variations in identified compounds.
  • The choice of homogenization buffer influenced the proteomic profile.
  • Observed changes in identified proteins based on extraction technique.

Conclusions:

  • Protein extraction methods are a major source of variability in proteomic studies.
  • Careful optimization of sample homogenization and protein extraction is essential for reproducible results.
  • Findings are valuable for designing future proteomic studies, particularly in cancer research.