Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026
Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
Published on: March 18, 2020
Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and
Julie Hallet1, David Wallace2, Abraham El-Sedfy2
1Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Objective:
To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Participants:
All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured.
Results:
Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers-low (121+ min), medium (31-120min), high (6-30min), and immediate (0-5min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages' content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing.
Conclusions:
Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.
