Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?
J A Anderson1,2,3, M S Meyn4,5,6,7,8, C Shuman4,5,6,9
1Department of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Insights
Parents undergoing whole genome sequencing (WGS) for their children often feel an obligation to receive adult-onset secondary variants (SVs), even when ambivalent. This "inflicted ought" challenges guidelines for returning incidental findings in pediatric genomic medicine.
Area of Science:
- Genomic Medicine
- Pediatric Genetics
- Bioethics
Background:
- Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used in pediatrics for diagnosis.
- Returning secondary variants (SVs) in pediatric WGS raises complex ethical and practical questions.
- Parental experiences and preferences regarding SV return are crucial for clinical implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore parents' experiences and preferences concerning the return of adult-onset secondary variants (SVs) from pediatric whole genome sequencing (WGS).
- To understand the motivations and ambivalences parents have towards receiving medically actionable genomic information unrelated to their child's current condition.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative interviews were conducted with parents whose children were undergoing WGS at the SickKids Genome Clinic.
- Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data regarding parents' WGS experiences and SV preferences.
- 23 parents from 18 families participated in the study.
Main Results:
- Parents viewed WGS as a valuable diagnostic tool but expressed ambivalence about receiving adult-onset SVs.
- A sense of self-imposed obligation to know their child's SVs, termed "inflicted ought," was reported by many parents.
- Some parents opted to receive SV information for their child but not for themselves.
Conclusions:
- Parental enthusiasm for WGS as a diagnostic test coexists with a perceived duty to learn about potential adult-onset conditions in their children.
- "Inflicted ought" highlights a parental obligation that challenges current guidelines for reporting incidental findings in pediatric WGS.
- The findings suggest that not all parents prioritize relational aspects of their child's best interests, impacting justifications for current secondary findings policies.
Objective:
To better understand the consequences of returning whole genome sequencing (WGS) results in paediatrics and facilitate its evidence-based clinical implementation, we studied parents' experiences with WGS and their preferences for the return of adult-onset secondary variants (SVs)-medically actionable genomic variants unrelated to their child's current medical condition that predict adult-onset disease.
Methods:
We conducted qualitative interviews with parents whose children were undergoing WGS as part of the SickKids Genome Clinic, a research project that studies the impact of clinical WGS on patients, families, and the healthcare system. Interviews probed parents' experience with and motivation for WGS as well as their preferences related to SVs. Interviews were analysed thematically.
Results:
Of 83 invited, 23 parents from 18 families participated. These parents supported WGS as a diagnostic test, perceiving clear intrinsic and instrumental value. However, many parents were ambivalent about receiving SVs, conveying a sense of self-imposed obligation to take on the 'weight' of knowing their child's SVs, however unpleasant. Some parents chose to learn about adult-onset SVs for their child but not for themselves.
Conclusions:
Despite general enthusiasm for WGS as a diagnostic test, many parents felt a duty to learn adult-onset SVs. Analogous to 'inflicted insight', we call this phenomenon 'inflicted ought'. Importantly, not all parents of children undergoing WGS view the best interests of their child in relational terms, thereby challenging an underlying justification for current ACMG guidelines for reporting incidental secondary findings from whole exome and WGS.
More Related Videos
05:51A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
Published on: June 15, 2011
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Genomics
Sanger Sequencing
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons