Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: November 1, 2010
An interlaboratory comparison of control materials for use with hematofluorometers
P J Parsons1, N V Stanton, E W Gunter
1Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany 12201-0509.
Erythrocyte protoporphyrin control materials were evaluated for stability and target value accuracy. Aviv Biomedical materials showed the best stability, but their target values were inaccurate, while Kaulson Laboratories materials were less stable.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Hematology
Background:
- Erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP) control materials are essential for accurate hematofluorometer readings.
- Variability in control material stability and target values can impact clinical diagnostics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the stability of four EP control materials at different storage temperatures.
- To validate manufacturer-assigned target values for EP control materials.
- To evaluate the suitability of EP control materials for use with various hematofluorometers.
Main Methods:
- An interlaboratory study involving three reference laboratories and five hematofluorometers.
- Evaluation of four EP control materials (Aviv Biomedical, Helena Laboratories, Kaulson Laboratories, New York State Department of Health).
- Stability testing at room temperature, refrigeration, and freezer conditions.
- Calibration of instruments using a consensus acetic acid-ethyl acetate extraction procedure.
Main Results:
- Aviv Biomedical and New York State materials exhibited superior stability compared to Kaulson Laboratories and Helena Laboratories.
- Aviv Biomedical's target values were outside the acceptable consensus range.
- Kaulson Laboratories' target values were within the acceptable range but demonstrated poor stability.
- Helena Laboratories materials were unsuitable for use with Aviv and Environmental Science Associates hematofluorometers due to unit differences and data scatter.
Conclusions:
- No single EP control material met all criteria for stability and target value accuracy across different hematofluorometers.
- Further development is needed to ensure reliable EP control materials for clinical use.
- Interlaboratory standardization of EP measurement procedures is crucial.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring Granulocyte and Monocyte Phagocytosis and Oxidative Burst Activity in Human Blood
Published on: September 12, 2016
06:22Standardization of Transfer across Labs between Flow Cytometers for Detection of Lymphocytes in Japanese Encephalitis Vaccinated Children
Published on: February 10, 2023