Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.7K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.7K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

17.2K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.2K
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

207
Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem:...
207
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

221
Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often...
221
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.6K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond right or wrong: How partial credit scoring on multiple-choice questions improves student performance and assessment perceptions.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2025
Same author

Influence of the number, timing, and types of advanced pharmacy practice experiences on residency matching.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2024
Same author

Using Performance Improvement Methods to Evaluate Processes for Writing Multiple-Choice Test Questions in the Postlicensure Clinical Environment: A Case Study.

Journal of continuing education in nursing·2024
Same author

Alexa, write my exam: ChatGPT for MCQ creation.

Medical education·2024
Same author

Evaluating the Quality of Multiple-Choice Test Questions in the Postlicensure Environment.

Journal of continuing education in nursing·2024
Same author

Distribution of COVID-19 Home Testing Through Community Health Centers: Results of the <i>COVID CoNOce MÁS Study</i>.

Journal of primary care & community health·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.8K

Student evaluation team focus groups increase students' satisfaction with the overall course evaluation process.

Katharina Brandl1, Jess Mandel2, Babbi Winegarden2

  • 1Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.

Medical Education
|December 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The student evaluation team (SET) process enhances medical education feedback by enabling direct dialogue between students and faculty. This collaborative approach significantly boosts satisfaction with the educational evaluation process.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.8K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Health Professions Education
  • Academic Evaluation

Background:

  • Traditional online feedback systems in medical schools lack interactive dialogue between students and course directors.
  • Limitations of online feedback include inability to clarify student comments or engage in problem-solving discussions.
  • A novel Student Evaluation Team (SET) process was developed to address these limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the implementation and evaluate the effectiveness of the Student Evaluation Team (SET) process.
  • To assess the impact of the SET process on student and course director satisfaction with educational feedback.
  • To determine if the SET process can improve the quality of communication and problem-solving in medical education.

Main Methods:

  • The SET process involved randomly selected students, course directors, deans, and faculty in facilitated meetings post-course.
  • Meetings were conducted for core courses in the first two years of medical school, averaging 29 annually.
  • Student and course director satisfaction surveys, along with overall evaluation satisfaction data from 885 students (2010-2015), were used to assess the SET process.

Main Results:

  • Both students and course directors reported a positive experience with the SET process.
  • Students felt their input was valued and that suggested changes were more likely to be implemented.
  • Student satisfaction with the overall evaluation process significantly increased following the implementation of SETs.

Conclusions:

  • The SET process serves as a valuable supplement to existing online evaluation systems in medical schools.
  • Implementing the SET process enhances satisfaction for both students and faculty members regarding educational evaluations.
  • The SET process facilitates improved communication and collaborative problem-solving in medical training programs.