Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Assessing Skin Changes for Chronic Venous Insufficiency in People With Dark Skin Tones and the Impact on the Patient Journey and Clinical Care.

International journal of vascular medicine·2026

Same author

Prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis through optimising care: the PREVENT-IAD Synopsis.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026

Same author

The Barriers and Facilitators Healthcare Professionals' Experience When Assessing the Cutaneous Manifestations of Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Peripheral Arterial Disease in People With Dark Skin Tones: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

International wound journal·2026

Same author

Development of a complex intervention to support patients managing cystic fibrosis diabetes.

Patient education and counseling·2025

Same author

PREVENTion and treatment of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD) through optimising care: development and feasibility cluster randomised trial of the IAD-Manual (PREVENT-IAD).

Pilot and feasibility studies·2025

Same author

Conducting adult social care research in the UK-impacts of challenges to study processes on study feasibility.

Age and ageing·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

The Glasgow Coma Scale in adults: doing it right.

Ismalia de Sousa¹, Sue Woodward²

¹Stroke and Neurosciences, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London.

Emergency Nurse : the Journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association

|December 8, 2016

Summary

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) remains crucial for assessing neurological patient consciousness after 40 years. Understanding GCS assessment accuracy factors and stimuli is vital for effective clinical decision-making.

Keywords:

GCS Glasgow Coma Scale emergency nursing neurological assessment

More Related Videos

Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury

Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury

Published on: November 9, 2018

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cerebral Ischemia Research with a Simplified Rat Model

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cerebral Ischemia Research with a Simplified Rat Model

Published on: July 5, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury

Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury

Published on: November 9, 2018

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cerebral Ischemia Research with a Simplified Rat Model

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cerebral Ischemia Research with a Simplified Rat Model

Published on: July 5, 2024

Area of Science:

Neurology
Clinical Assessment

Background:

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has been the standard for over 40 years.
Accurate assessment of consciousness is critical for neurological patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore optimal clinical use of the GCS.
To examine factors influencing GCS assessment accuracy.
To clarify the distinction between peripheral and central stimuli.

Main Methods:

Review of clinical practice guidelines for GCS.
Analysis of factors affecting GCS reliability.
Explanation of stimulus types in GCS.

Main Results:

GCS remains a cornerstone in neurological assessment.
Understanding assessment nuances improves patient monitoring.
Distinguishing stimuli is key to accurate GCS scoring.

Conclusions:

Proper GCS application is essential for monitoring neurological conditions.
Awareness of influencing factors enhances assessment validity.
Clear understanding of stimuli improves clinical decision-making.