Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

317
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
317
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

1.5K
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
1.5K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

558
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
558
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

1.1K
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
1.1K
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

2.9K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
2.9K
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

1.7K
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Executive Function and Self-Regulation: Bi-Directional Longitudinal Associations and Prediction of Early Academic Skills.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

Correction: Improving Physical Task Performance with Counterfactual and Prefactual Thinking.

PloS one·2020
Same author

In limbo: A systematic review of psychological responses and coping among people with a missing loved one.

Journal of clinical psychology·2019
Same author

Happiness and counterfactual thinking at the 2016 Summer Olympic Games.

Journal of sports sciences·2019
Same author

Assessing children's cognitive flexibility with the Shape Trail Test.

PloS one·2018
Same author

Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands.

Perception·2004
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

549.1K

Improving Physical Task Performance with Counterfactual and Prefactual Thinking.

Cecilia Hammell1, Amy Y C Chan1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, North Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Plos One
|December 13, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Both counterfactual thinking ("what might have been") and prefactual thinking ("what might be") improve future task performance. Prefactual thinking involves more controllable elements, but both thought types enhance performance similarly.

More Related Videos

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

10.3K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

549.1K
A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

10.3K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Counterfactual thinking (reflecting on past mistakes) improves future performance by informing action plans.
  • Prefactual thinking (imagining future possibilities) is future-oriented and focuses on controllable elements, potentially offering greater preparatory benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether prefactual thinking offers greater performance enhancement than counterfactual thinking.
  • To examine the impact of hypothetical thought content on actual task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Participants performed a computer-simulated physical task, engaging in counterfactual, prefactual, or control thinking between trials.
  • Experiment 2: Replicated Experiment 1 using a dynamic balance task.
  • Both experiments compared performance improvements across the different thinking conditions.

Main Results:

  • Prefactual thinking contained more controllable features than counterfactual thinking, as hypothesized.
  • Both counterfactual and prefactual thinking significantly improved task performance compared to the control group.
  • No significant difference in performance improvement was found between the counterfactual and prefactual thinking groups.

Conclusions:

  • Both counterfactual and prefactual thinking serve a preparatory function, enhancing future task performance.
  • While prefactual thinking focuses on more controllable aspects, its performance benefits are comparable to counterfactual thinking.
  • These findings highlight the value of hypothetical thinking for improving future behavior and performance.