Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are words represented by nodes?

G O Stone, G C Van Orden

    Memory & Cognition
    |September 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study on semantic priming found backward priming effects were similar to forward priming with illegal nonwords but not legal ones. These findings challenge existing word recognition theories.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Is phonology bypassed in normal or dyslexic development?

    Annals of dyslexia·2013
    Same author

    Pseudohomophones and word recognition.

    Memory & cognition·2001
    Same author

    When SOFA primes TOUCH: interdependence of spelling, sound, and meaning in "semantically mediated" phonological priming.

    Memory & cognition·2001
    Same author

    Can one ever be too wealthy or too chaste? Searching for nonlinearities in mate judgment.

    Journal of personality and social psychology·2001
    Same author

    Reading homographs: orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1999
    Same author

    Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Psycholinguistics
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Semantic priming investigates how word meaning influences recognition.
    • Existing models like spreading-activation and expectancy-set have limitations in explaining priming effects.
    • The role of nonword foil legality in priming tasks requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare forward and backward semantic priming effects.
    • To examine the influence of nonword foil legality on priming.
    • To test predictions of spreading-activation and expectancy-set theories.

    Main Methods:

    • A lexical decision task was employed.
    • Concurrent pretarget and posttarget primes were used.
    • Nonword foils were manipulated for orthographic legality.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Backward priming facilitation matched forward priming facilitation when nonword foils were illegal.
    • Backward priming facilitation was not significant when nonword foils were legal.
    • Results challenge the assumptions of distinct, nonoverlapping memory representations in word recognition.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing spreading-activation and expectancy-set models are insufficient.
    • A new model proposing semantic-space (distributed) representations is suggested.
    • Functional unitization via resonant matching may explain word recognition processes.