Unequivocal evidence supporting the segregated flow intestinal model that discriminates intestine versus liver...

Merits of the segregated flow model (SFM), highlighting the intestine as inert serosa and active enterocyte regions, with a smaller fractional (f_Q < 0.3) intestinal flow (Q_I ) perfusing the enterocyte region, are described. Less drug in the circulation reaches the enterocytes due to the lower flow (f_Q Q_I ) in comparison with drug administered into the gut lumen, fostering the idea of route-dependent intestinal removal. The SFM has been found superior to the traditional model (TM), which views the serosa and enterocytes totally as a well-mixed tissue perfused by 100% of the intestinal flow, Q_I . The SFM model is able to explain the lower extents of intestinal metabolism of enalapril, morphine and midazolam with i.v. vs. p.o. dosing. For morphine, the urine/bile ratio of the metabolite, morphine glucuronide MGurineMGbile for p.o. was 2.6× that of i.v. This was due to the higher proportion of intestinally formed morphine glucuronide, appearing more in urine than in bile due to its low permeability and greater extent of intestinal formation with p.o. administration. By contrast, the TM predicted the same MGurineMGbile for p.o. vs. i.v. The TM predicted that the contributions of the intestine:liver to first-pass removal were 46%:54% for both p.o. and i.v. The SFM predicted same 46%:54% (intestine:liver) for p.o., but 9%:91% for i.v. By contrast, the kinetics of codeine, the precursor of morphine, was described equally well by the SFM- and TM-PBPK models, a trend suggesting that intestinal metabolism of codeine is negligible. Fits to these PBPK models further provide insightful information towards metabolite formation: available fractions and the fractions of hepatic and total clearances that form the metabolite in question. The SFM-PBPK model is useful to identify not only the presence of intestinal metabolism but the contributions of the intestine and liver for metabolite formation. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.