Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Ethical Issues

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cochrane Evaluation of (Semi-) Automated Review Methods (CESAR): Protocol for an adaptive platform study within reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Area under the likelihood curve as a measure of evidential weight in nonsignificant meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Assessing the trustworthiness of health guidelines recommendations: the transparent, rigorous, useable, standardized, and trustworthy guide (TRUSTGUIDES) tools development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Evaluating search approaches for a network meta-analysis: a case study of Epistemonikos Database of Trials, CENTRAL, and other sources.

BMC medical research methodology·2026

Same author

Evaluating evidential strength of statistically nonsignificant meta-analyses with likelihood ratios: a meta-epidemiological study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Reverse fragility index shows high fragility in Cochrane meta-analyses with P values between 0.05 and 0.20: a meta-epidemiological study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

["Bringing one's own unique perspective into research" - Participants' experiences and perceptions regarding the implementation of a citizen advisory board in general practice research].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026

Same journal

Developing a non-pharmacological pain management toolkit in nursing homes using a structured evidence-generation approach.

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026

Same journal

[Between proximity and need: Determinants of longer travel times to emergency departments - A sub-evaluation of the utilisation survey in Bavarian emergency departments].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026

Same journal

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026

Same journal

[Patient involvement in clinical research: An explorative interview study on researchers' perspectives, barriers, and support needs].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026

Same journal

[Requirements for an effective application of artificial intelligence in interpersonal communication in healthcare: A scoping review].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

How contextual issues can distort shared decision making.

Gerald Gartlehner¹, Nina Matyas²

¹Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Danube University Krems, Austria; RTI International, NC, USA.

Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen

|December 19, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Shared decision making (SDM) in healthcare aims for informed patient-physician agreement. However, physician beliefs, evidence uncertainty, and patient value ambiguity can hinder SDM, necessitating a neutral environment.

Keywords:

Gesundheitsversorgung Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung Patientenorientierte Medizin informed decision informierte Entscheidungen patient participation patient-centered care quality health care shared decision making

More Related Videos

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Health Services Research
Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

Shared decision making (SDM) is a promoted approach for patient-physician mutual decisions.
SDM integrates scientific evidence, clinical experience, and patient values.
The practical implementation of SDM can be challenging and potentially misused.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss contextual factors impacting informed decision-making in medicine.
To highlight barriers and shortcomings in the shared decision-making process.
To emphasize the ethical importance and necessity of SDM in healthcare.

Main Methods:

Summary of a presentation at the 17th Annual Conference of the German Network Evidence-based Medicine.
Discussion of three key contextual factors influencing shared decision making.
Analysis of potential biases and conflicts of interest in the decision-making process.

Main Results:

Physician opinions, evidence uncertainty, and patient value uncertainty significantly impact SDM.
Despite challenges, SDM remains the primary approach in modern medicine.
Not all patients desire active participation in decision-making.

Conclusions:

Shared decision making is central to quality healthcare due to its ethical underpinnings.
Ensuring a neutral environment, free from bias and conflicts of interest, is crucial for effective SDM.
Advocates must acknowledge diverse patient preferences regarding participation in decision-making.