Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: a feasibility study
Rolf Symons1, Tyler E Cork1, Pooyan Sahbaee2
1Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
|December 20, 2016
Summary
Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanners offer improved Hounsfield unit accuracy and stability for lung cancer screening compared to energy-integrating detector (EID) systems. PCD technology may enable reduced radiation doses while maintaining diagnostic image quality.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Photon-Counting CT
Background:
- Low-dose computed tomography (CT) is crucial for lung cancer screening.
- Conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT systems face limitations in image quality at reduced radiation doses.
- Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT technology offers potential advantages for dose reduction and image quality enhancement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of using whole-body PCD CT for low-dose lung cancer screening.
- To compare the performance of PCD CT against conventional EID CT.
- To assess image quality metrics including Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at various radiation doses and tube voltages.
Main Methods:
- Radiation dose-matched scans of the COPDGene 2 phantom were acquired using both EID and PCD CT systems.
- Scans were performed at different radiation dose levels (CTDIvol: 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mGy) and tube voltages (120, 100, and 80 kVp).
- Quantitative analysis included HU accuracy, noise levels, and CNR for detecting ground-glass nodules (GGN) and emphysema.
Main Results:
- PCD CT demonstrated superior HU accuracy and stability across all tested parameters compared to EID CT.
- PCD CT exhibited significantly lower noise levels, especially at lower radiation doses (0.75 mGy) and tube voltages (100 and 80 kVp).
- PCD CT resulted in higher CNR for GGN and emphysema detection, with up to 10% less noise and 11% higher CNR at 0.75 mGy.
Conclusions:
- PCD CT provides better HU stability and reproducibility for lung, GGN, and emphysema regions at lower radiation doses than EID CT.
- PCD technology shows promise for reducing radiation exposure in lung cancer screening without compromising diagnostic image quality.
- The findings support the clinical feasibility of PCD CT for effective low-dose lung cancer screening.


