Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.3K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.3K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.0K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.9K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.1K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.1K
Midrange01:07

Midrange

4.5K
A somewhat easy to compute quantitative estimate of a data set’s central tendency is its midrange, which is defined as the mean of the minimum and maximum values of an ordered data set.
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to...
4.5K
Interval Level of Measurement00:55

Interval Level of Measurement

19.8K
For effective statistical analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
19.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Socioeconomic inequity in extreme outcomes within very pre-term and/or very low birthweight infants: evidence from multi-national cohorts.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Outcomes in Early Adulthood for Individuals Born Very Preterm and/or with Very Low Birth Weight: Evidence from Multinational Cohorts.

Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice·2026
Same author

Adopting the estimand framework in prophylactic vaccine trials.

Vaccine·2025
Same author

Evaluation of unfractionated heparin therapy for venous thromboembolism using adjusted body weight in elderly or higher weight patients.

Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis·2024
Same author

15th Annual University of Pennsylvania conference on statistical issues in clinical trial/advances in time-to-event analyses in clinical trials (afternoon panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2024
Same author

Regression Approaches to Assess Effect of Treatments That Arrest Progression of Symptoms.

Statistics in medicine·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K

Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates using mid-p gamma intervals.

Michael P Fay1, Sungwook Kim1,2

  • 1National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Biostatistics Research Branch, 5601 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9820, USA.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|December 24, 2016
PubMed
Summary

A new mid-p modification to the gamma confidence interval improves statistical coverage for age-dependent disease rates, like cancer. This method offers better central intervals and nominal coverage, especially when traditional methods are overly conservative.

Keywords:
Age-adjusted ratesDirectly standardized ratesGamma confidence intervalMid-p confidence intervalWeighted sum of Poisson variates

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.5K
Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.5K
Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Directly standardized rates are crucial for age-dependent diseases like cancer.
  • Standard statistical modeling involves complex Poisson random variables with unknown means.
  • Existing gamma confidence intervals offer coverage but can be overly conservative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel mid-p modification of the gamma confidence interval.
  • To address limitations of existing gamma intervals, including overly conservative coverage and non-centrality.
  • To improve statistical accuracy in modeling age-dependent disease rates.

Main Methods:

  • Application of a mid-p modification to the gamma confidence interval.
  • Statistical simulations to assess coverage properties compared to standard gamma intervals.
  • Evaluation of interval centrality and error rates.

Main Results:

  • The mid-p gamma interval demonstrates improved coverage, often achieving at least nominal levels where the standard gamma interval is conservative.
  • This modification provides a more central interval, with upper and lower coverage error rates frequently below half the nominal error rate.
  • While not guaranteeing coverage in all scenarios, it offers a practical improvement for specific statistical challenges.

Conclusions:

  • The mid-p gamma confidence interval is a valuable enhancement for analyzing age-dependent disease rates.
  • It offers a more accurate and central interval estimation, particularly beneficial in situations with conservative traditional methods.
  • This approach advances statistical techniques for epidemiological research and public health surveillance.