Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Digital breast tomosynthesis: Dose and image quality assessment.
A Maldera1, P De Marco2, P E Colombo3
1Medical Physics Dept, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162 Milano, Italy; Post Graduate School of Medical Physics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Physics Dept, Via Celoria, 16, 20133 Milano, Italy.
This study compared four digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems, finding significant variability in image quality and dose. Performance varied based on acquisition geometry and reconstruction, impacting resolution and artifact spread.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is an advancement over 2D mammography.
- Understanding system performance is crucial for optimizing breast cancer detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To physically characterize and compare the performance of four leading DBT systems.
- To evaluate the impact of acquisition geometries and reconstruction parameters on DBT image quality and radiation dose.
Main Methods:
- Four DBT systems (GE, Siemens, Hologic, Fujifilm) were evaluated using physical metrics.
- Key parameters assessed included Average Glandular Dose (AGD), in-plane/in-depth resolution, Signal Difference to Noise Ratio (SDNR), and Artefact Spread Function (ASF).
Main Results:
- All systems had AGD below EUREF limits for 2D imaging, with DBT/2D dose ratios ranging from 1.1 to 1.9.
- In-plane resolution varied, with worse performance in the tube travel direction for all systems.
- In-depth resolution improved with scan angle but was influenced by reconstruction algorithms; Siemens and GE showed superior z-resolution compared to Fujifilm.
- Artefact Spread Function (ASF) showed system-dependent variations, not solely correlated with scan angle due to differing algorithms.
- SDNR analysis indicated pixel binning enhances detectability at a fixed dose.
Conclusions:
- Significant performance differences exist among the evaluated DBT systems.
- Acquisition geometry and reconstruction parameters critically influence DBT image quality and dose efficiency.
- This comparative analysis provides valuable insights for selecting and optimizing DBT systems in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
X-ray Imaging

