Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Bayesian Baskets: A Novel Design for Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials.
Lorenzo Trippa1, Brian Michael Alexander1
1Lorenzo Trippa and Brian Michael Alexander, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Lorenzo Trippa, Harvard School of Public Health; and Brian Michael Alexander, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
This study introduces a Bayesian basket (BB) design for clinical trials, enhancing efficiency and information generation for both experimental therapeutics and predictive biomarkers. The BB design proves superior to traditional and biomarker-agnostic approaches in various scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trial Design
- Biomarker Development
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- Biomarker-based clinical trials are crucial for therapeutic development and precision medicine.
- Existing trial designs struggle to efficiently integrate varying levels of pretrial biomarker evidence.
- There is a need for flexible trial designs that explicitly account for pretrial biomarker confidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an efficient and flexible clinical trial design incorporating pretrial biomarker evidence.
- To compare the performance of the proposed Bayesian basket (BB) design against traditional (TB) and biomarker-agnostic (BA) designs.
- To assess the ability of the BB design to generate information on both therapeutic efficacy and biomarker predictive capacity.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel randomization procedure that explicitly incorporates pretrial estimates of biomarker predictive capacity.
- Simulated hypothetical multiarm clinical trials under various scenarios to compare BB, BA, and TB designs.
- Evaluated designs based on efficiency, power, and information generated regarding biomarker predictive capacity.
Main Results:
- The Bayesian basket (BB) design demonstrated greater efficiency compared to the biomarker-agnostic (BA) design.
- BB generated more information on biomarker predictive capacity than both BA and traditional basket (TB) designs.
- BB increased statistical power over BA when biomarkers were predictive and therapeutics were broadly effective.
Conclusions:
- The Bayesian basket (BB) design provides an efficient method for evaluating experimental therapeutics and predictive biomarkers simultaneously.
- This flexible design accommodates varying levels of pretrial biomarker evidence within a unified platform.
- The BB design enhances the explicitness of clinical trial design decisions regarding biomarkers.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Clinical Trials: Overview
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...

