Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantitative Analysis01:12

Quantitative Analysis

1.6K
Quantitative analysis is a technique for measuring the amount of specific constituents in a sample. When the sample's composition is unknown, qualitative analysis is performed first to identify its components, which ensures that the correct substances are measured during the quantitative phase.
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
1.6K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.3K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.3K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

National Annual Dioxin Emissions Estimate for Hazardous Waste Incinerators.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2017
Same journal

Wildfire smoke indoors: A review of infiltration risk factors and exposure mitigation strategies.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

Particulate matter emissions from the iron and steel industry of China: Patterns, drivers, and implications.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

From landfills to resources: Comprehensive characterization of industrial and commercial waste to support recovery pathways.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

Urban ozone nonattainment: Interconnected challenges in the Intermountain Western U.S.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

DynLink-AQ: Adaptive inter-station connectivity for multi-pollutant, multi-horizon air quality forecasting across Delhi.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
Same journal

Polonium-210 levels in placental maternal-fetal barrier: A pilot study conducted in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.7K

Quantitation Limits for Reference Methods 23, 26, and 29.

H Gregor Rigo1, A John Chandler2

  • 1a Rigo & Rigo Associates, Inc. , Berea , Ohio , USA.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)
|January 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study determined the reference method quantitation limits (RMQLs) for municipal waste combustor emissions. Analytical laboratory precision is not the main source of uncertainty for these measurements.

More Related Videos

NanoDrop Microvolume Quantitation of Nucleic Acids
09:28

NanoDrop Microvolume Quantitation of Nucleic Acids

Published on: November 22, 2010

207.8K
Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae
10:20

Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae

Published on: July 10, 2015

16.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.7K
NanoDrop Microvolume Quantitation of Nucleic Acids
09:28

NanoDrop Microvolume Quantitation of Nucleic Acids

Published on: November 22, 2010

207.8K
Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae
10:20

Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae

Published on: July 10, 2015

16.6K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Air Pollution Control

Background:

  • Municipal waste combustors are significant sources of air pollutants.
  • Accurate quantification of emissions is crucial for regulatory compliance and environmental protection.
  • Establishing reliable quantitation limits is essential for method validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the Reference Method Quantitation Limits (RMQLs) for specific pollutants emitted from municipal waste combustors.
  • To assess the precision and uncertainty associated with Methods 23, 26, and 29.
  • To identify the primary sources of uncertainty in emission measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Dual- and quad-train sampling was performed at a municipal waste combustor in December 1996.
  • Reference Method Quantitation Limits (RMQLs) were established for Methods 23, 26, and 29.
  • Pollutants quantified include dioxins, furans, particulates, cadmium, lead, mercury, and HCl.

Main Results:

  • RMQLs for International Toxic Equivalent dioxins ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 ng/dsm³ (7% O₂-corrected).
  • RMQLs for total dioxins and furans were between 3 and 21 ng/dsm³.
  • RMQLs for other analytes varied: 0.02-0.06 gr/dsft³ for particulates, 35-90 mg/dsm³ for cadmium, 500-1,900 mg/dsm³ for lead, 20-90 mg/dsm³ for mercury, and 130-220 ppmdv for HCl.
  • Established RMQLs were 10 to 1,000 times higher than laboratory method detection limits.

Conclusions:

  • The analytical laboratory is not the primary source of uncertainty in these emission measurements.
  • Improving laboratory methods alone will not significantly enhance measurement precision.
  • The study highlights the need to address other sources of uncertainty beyond laboratory analysis for accurate emission monitoring.