Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing aperiodic brain activity between eyes open rest and dynamic visual input using magnetoencephalography.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Multisensory horizon.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Sex-specific differences and diagnostic tool performance in the neuropsychiatric profile of Parkinson's disease.

BMC neurology·2026
Same author

Abnormal left prefrontal N100 and its relationship with fronto-limbic metabolism in major depressive disorder.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Anodal tDCS over right DLPFC does not improve visuospatial working memory in schizophrenia: a single-session, sham-controlled study.

BMC psychiatry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Technique and Considerations in the Use of 4x1 Ring High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation HD-tDCS
15:05

Technique and Considerations in the Use of 4x1 Ring High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation HD-tDCS

Published on: July 14, 2013

38.6K

Individual Differences and State-Dependent Responses in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Tzu-Yu Hsu1, Chi-Hung Juan2, Philip Tseng3

  • 1Research Center of Brain and Consciousness, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei, Taiwan; Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityNew Taipei City, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Health and Biotechnology Law, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei, Taiwan.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|January 10, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on visual working memory depend on individual differences and task difficulty. Responsiveness to tDCS is consistent within individuals, regardless of polarity, highlighting state-dependent stimulation outcomes.

Keywords:
non-invasive brain stimulationright posterior parietal cortex (rPPC)state-dependencetranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)visual working memory (VWM)

More Related Videos

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

30.3K
High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation During Sleep
09:23

High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation During Sleep

Published on: December 5, 2025

328

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Technique and Considerations in the Use of 4x1 Ring High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation HD-tDCS
15:05

Technique and Considerations in the Use of 4x1 Ring High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation HD-tDCS

Published on: July 14, 2013

38.6K
Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

30.3K
High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation During Sleep
09:23

High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation During Sleep

Published on: December 5, 2025

328

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuromodulation

Background:

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely used to modulate neural activity.
  • The traditional assumption of anodal stimulation increasing and cathodal decreasing activity is challenged by mixed findings.
  • Individual variability and influencing factors in tDCS effects remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how tDCS polarity, baseline performance, and task difficulty interact to influence visual working memory (VWM).
  • To explore the consistency of individual responses to tDCS across different conditions.
  • To identify factors contributing to variability in tDCS research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a visual working memory (VWM) paradigm with manipulated tDCS polarities.
  • Assessed participants using different baseline measures (Corsi Block Tapping, Digit Span).
  • Varied task difficulty to observe its impact on tDCS outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Low performers showed VWM decrements with anodal tDCS, unlike high performers.
  • Significant tDCS effects were only observed at optimal task difficulty levels.
  • High intra-individual consistency in responsiveness to tDCS was found, irrespective of polarity.

Conclusions:

  • tDCS effects are state-dependent, modulated by task difficulty and individual differences.
  • Baseline measures critically influence the observed tDCS effects.
  • Understanding these interactive factors is crucial for interpreting tDCS literature and designing future studies.