Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: Meaningful Changes in the Final Rule Brings Cautious Optimism
Laxmaiah Manchikanti1, Standiford Helm Ii, Aaron K Calodney
1Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) under MACRA replaced the SGR formula, streamlining quality reporting. Final rules offer flexibility, reduced burdens, and penalty avoidance, making MIPS more meaningful for providers.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy and Management
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Medicare and Medicaid Services
Background:
- The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) repealed the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula.
- MACRA introduced the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) to consolidate quality reporting programs.
- MIPS integrated Meaningful Use (MU), Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), and Value-Based Payment (VBP) with a new Improvement Activities (IA) category.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the evolution of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) from its proposed to final rule.
- To assess the impact of stakeholder feedback, including from the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP), on MIPS implementation.
- To evaluate the changes made to MIPS components, scoring, and reporting requirements in the final rule.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the proposed and final rules for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) under MACRA.
- Review of stakeholder comments and their incorporation into the final MIPS regulations.
- Examination of changes in MIPS category weighting, performance periods, and reporting thresholds.
Main Results:
- The final MIPS rule incorporated significant stakeholder feedback, including a 90-day reporting period and acceptance of non-MIPS measures.
- CMS introduced mechanisms for penalty avoidance, such as reporting for a single patient or a 90-day period.
- The final rule reduced the number of quality measures, eased the burden of the Advancing Care Information (ACI) and Improvement Activities (IA) categories, and improved coordination between performance categories.
Conclusions:
- The final MIPS rule demonstrates increased flexibility and reduced reporting burden compared to the proposed rule.
- While improvements have been made, concerns persist regarding scoring for quality improvement, resource use methodology, and the prominence of ACI.
- MIPS has been modified to be more meaningful, with bonuses for exceptional performance and adjusted reporting requirements for providers.
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Compensation Mechanisms
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
The theory differentiates between...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Standards of Care II

