[Registration of assessments in orthopaedic residents' portfolios is falling short]
S N van Vendeloo1, P L P Brand, B J Burger
1Isala, Zwolle.
Objective:
To evaluate of the number of registered competency assessments in the portfolios of orthopaedic residents in the Netherlands, for whom a competency-based training programme is mandatory.
Design:
National cohort study.
Method:
We collected data regarding the registered assessments of all orthopaedic residents who finished their training between 2012-2015. We determined the number of registered assessments of 'standard orthopaedic treatments' (evaluating residents' competency in 70 different orthopaedic treatments), objective structured clinical skills evaluations (OSCEs), critically appraised topics (CATs), and 360 degree feedback appraisals. We compared the number of registered assessments in the portfolios with the minimum requirements laid down by the training curriculum.
Results:
A total of 196 residents finished their training between 2012 and 2015. These residents finished their training with a mean (i.e., percentage of minimally required number of assessments) of 17.0 (34%) 'standard orthopaedic treatments' (level 4 or 5), 13.6 (34%) OSCEs, 2.6 (33%) CATs and 0.2 (4%) 360 degree feedback.
Conclusion:
On average, only one-third of the minimally required number of assessments were registered in the portfolios of orthopaedic residents (OSCEs and standard orthopaedic treatments level 4 or 5). These revelations show that action is needed to improve the way in which the progress of residents is monitored. These findings are going to have an effect on the new curriculum which must be more practical and less complex. Additionally, external quality control will focus more on residents at the end of their training and on the training region involved. This information may serve as a framework for postgraduate training programmes in other scientific associations which also find themselves in the same process of modernisation.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
01:11Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
01:25Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
01:23Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
01:30Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
01:11Pulse Assessment Sites