Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

5.2K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
5.2K
Fundamentals of Nursing Process I01:27

Fundamentals of Nursing Process I

9.3K
The nursing process is the core of practice for every registered nurse to deliver holistic, patient-focused care. The following are the five steps in the nursing process.
9.3K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.7K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.7K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

19.1K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
19.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the Needs of Military-Connected Children and Resources to Address Those Needs.

Rand health quarterly·2025
Same author

2023 National Survey of Health Attitudes: Description and Top-Line Summary Data.

Rand health quarterly·2024
Same author

Evaluation Design for the Department of the Air Force's True North Program: Development of a Logic Model and Program Measures.

Rand health quarterly·2024
Same author

Veteran Single Parents: Surviving but Not Thriving.

Rand health quarterly·2024
Same author

Psychological Harms and Treatment of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in Adults: Systematic and Scoping Reviews to Inform Improved Care for Military Populations.

Rand health quarterly·2023
Same author

Considerations Around the Use of Intensive Outpatient Programs for Service Members Who Experienced Sexual Trauma in the U.S. Military.

Rand health quarterly·2023
Same journal

Letter from the Editor.

Rand health quarterly·2026
Same journal

The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States, Fifth Edition.

Rand health quarterly·2026
Same journal

U.S. Psychedelic Use and Microdosing in 2025: Insights from a Probability-Based and Nationally Representative Survey.

Rand health quarterly·2026
Same journal

Letter from the Editor.

Rand health quarterly·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of "Live Beyond": A Public Awareness Campaign to Address Adverse Childhood Experiences and Toxic Stress in California.

Rand health quarterly·2026
Same journal

China's Global Health Activities in Africa: Historical Perspectives and Case Studies.

Rand health quarterly·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.7K

A Systematic Process to Facilitate Evidence-Informed Decisionmaking Regarding Program Expansion.

Laurie T Martin, Coreen Farris, David M Adamson

    Rand Health Quarterly
    |January 14, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Department of Defense needs a systematic process to evaluate its psychological health and traumatic brain injury programs. RAND developed tools to assess program effectiveness and guide decisions on supporting and expanding evidence-based initiatives.

    More Related Videos

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
    05:47

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    1.7K
    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
    14:43

    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

    Published on: January 12, 2018

    13.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

    Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
    06:16

    Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

    Published on: June 6, 2020

    4.7K
    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
    05:47

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    1.7K
    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
    14:43

    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

    Published on: January 12, 2018

    13.7K

    Area of Science:

    • Military Health
    • Program Evaluation
    • Psychological Health

    Background:

    • The Department of Defense oversees over 200 psychological health and traumatic brain injury programs.
    • Current processes lack systematic methods for program development, tracking, and performance assessment.
    • A uniform decision-making approach for program support and expansion is absent.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a model and tools for a centralized, systematic process to aid decision-making for program support and expansion.
    • To address inefficiencies and resource misallocation in the current program portfolio.
    • To facilitate the expansion of evidence-based programs within the Department of Defense.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a Program Abstraction Form to collect program background, effectiveness data, and evaluation design.
    • Creation of the RAND Program Expansion Tool for standardized summary of program evaluation quality and outcomes.
    • Focus on decision-making for program expansion, not initial funding.

    Main Results:

    • A potential model and two tools (Program Abstraction Form, RAND Program Expansion Tool) were developed.
    • The tools aim to standardize the assessment of program effectiveness and evaluation quality.
    • The process supports systematic decision-making for continued program support and expansion.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed model and tools provide a framework for systematic oversight of psychological health and traumatic brain injury programs.
    • Standardized evaluation and decision-making can improve resource allocation and program effectiveness.
    • This approach facilitates informed choices regarding the support and expansion of promising programs.