Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.4K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.4K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.3K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.3K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

43.6K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
43.6K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

29.0K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
29.0K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

X implies Y - Testing Hypotheses of Direction of Effect Using Configural Frequency Analysis.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2026
Same author

Cumulant-Based Approaches for Testing the Assumption of Independent Errors in Non-Gaussian Parallel and Congeneric Measures.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same author

Control of Type 1 and Type 2 Errors in Configural Frequency Analysis.

Journal for person-oriented research·2026
Same author

Does X at Time 1 Cause Y at Time 2? Longitudinal Causal Learning with Hidden Confounders.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Conceptual and methodological advances for understanding contextual, identity, and cultural effects in intervention research: The contextually informed research model.

Journal of school psychology·2025
Same author

Right-sizing growth mixture models as multi-group growth and confirmatory factor models.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same journal

Empathy as a Risk Factor: A Theoretical Review on Depression-Induced Decline in Reading Performance Through the Mediation of Personality Dimensions.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Emotional Regulation in Aversive Social Interactions: A Review of the Rationalization Trap and the Impact of Affect Labeling.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2026
Same journal

From Static Ontology to Dynamic Generativity: A Relational-Dynamic Model of "Dao" and DRQ in Moral Education.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2026
Same journal

Temporal Experience and Human State Field: Toward a New Framework Bridging Physics and Perception Part I-Basic Arguments, Concepts, and Definitions.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fear: Disgust, Anger, and the Affective Core of Interpersonal Phobias.

Integrative psychological & behavioral science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K

Testing Event-Based Forms of Causality.

Alexander von Eye1, Wolfgang Wiedermann2

  • 1Michigan State University, 220 Trowbridge Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. voneye@msu.edu.

Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science
|January 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) to identify causal relations like necessity and sufficiency in empirical data. CFA helps analyze patterns supporting different types of causality, aiding in understanding complex relationships.

Keywords:
Configural frequency analysisEmpirical test of causalityNecessary causeSufficient and necessary causeSufficient cause

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.2K

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Statistical modeling
  • Empirical data analysis

Background:

  • Causal relations are fundamental in science, often categorized as necessity, sufficiency, or both.
  • Traditional methods using Boolean algebra or statement calculus analyze these relations in categorical contexts.
  • Analyzing empirical data for causal patterns requires robust statistical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) as a method for testing hypotheses about causal relations.
  • To develop CFA models for analyzing causality in both two-variable and multi-variable empirical datasets.
  • To provide a framework for empirical data analysts to investigate necessity, sufficiency, and combined causal types.

Main Methods:

  • Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) is employed to test hypotheses regarding causal relations.
  • Two distinct CFA approaches are presented: examining individual configurations and comparing supportive vs. non-supportive patterns.
  • Models are developed for analyzing causal relationships involving two or more variables.

Main Results:

  • Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) effectively tests hypotheses about different types of causal relations.
  • The proposed CFA approaches allow for the examination of specific event patterns supporting causality.
  • An empirical example demonstrated the application of CFA in predicting the sustainability of dietary habit changes.

Conclusions:

  • Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) offers a powerful tool for empirical analysis of causal relations.
  • The method supports the identification and testing of necessity and sufficiency in categorical data.
  • CFA provides a valuable framework for understanding complex causal patterns in real-world data.