Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Human Liver Microphysiological System for Assessing Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity In Vitro
Published on: January 31, 2022
Risks and benefits of phase I liver dysfunction studies: should patients with severe liver dysfunction be included in
Christos Fountzilas1,2, Selena Stuart1,3, Brian Hernandez1
1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7979 Wurzbach Rd, MC8026, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Abstract:
Introduction The goal of organ dysfunction Phase I trials is to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of novel agents in cancer patients with liver or kidney dysfunction, but the clinical benefit is not well established. Methods We reviewed 170 patients across 15 liver dysfunction studies at our institution, grouped based on the NCI-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria or Child-Pugh Score. Results The median survival for the entire cohort was two months and just one month amongst patients with severe liver dysfunction. Patients with normal or mild liver dysfunction, absence of tumor in liver, good performance status, higher serum albumin and lower bilirubin, aspartate transaminase and alkaline phosphatase had improved survival by univariate analysis. Serum albumin and liver function classification remained significant by multivariate analysis. Conclusion Given poor survival of patients with liver dysfunction, we need better criteria, such as albumin levels, for optimally selecting patients for liver dysfunction studies.
Insights
Cancer patients in phase I trials with liver dysfunction have poor survival. Albumin levels and liver function classification are key factors for selecting patients for these studies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Phase I trials aim to assess novel agents' safety and pharmacokinetics in cancer patients with organ dysfunction.
- The clinical benefit of these trials for patients with liver or kidney dysfunction is not well established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors in cancer patients with liver dysfunction participating in Phase I trials.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 170 patients across 15 liver dysfunction studies was conducted.
- Patients were grouped based on the National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria or Child-Pugh Score.
Main Results:
- The median survival for the entire cohort was two months, significantly lower (one month) for patients with severe liver dysfunction.
- Univariate analysis indicated improved survival for patients with normal/mild liver dysfunction, no liver tumor, good performance status, higher serum albumin, and lower bilirubin, AST, and ALP.
- Multivariate analysis confirmed serum albumin and liver function classification as significant prognostic factors for survival.
Conclusions:
- Cancer patients with liver dysfunction in Phase I trials exhibit poor survival rates.
- Current criteria for patient selection may need refinement, with serum albumin levels showing promise as a more optimal selection criterion.
More Related Videos
05:56Evaluation of the Feasibility, Safety, and Accuracy of an Intraoperative High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Treating Liver Metastases
Published on: January 9, 2019
06:45Author Spotlight: Advancing Liver Regeneration Research through ALPPS Mouse Model
Published on: January 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Phase I Oxidative Reactions: Overview
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Drug Metabolism: Phase I Reactions
Phase I Reactions: Oxidation of Aliphatic and Aromatic Carbon-Containing Systems
Oxidation reactions are fundamental in aromatic carbon-containing systems. An example is the hydroxylation of phenobarbital, a process that transforms it into...
Phase II Reactions: Glutathione Conjugation and Mercapturic Acid Formation
Several distinctive characteristics distinguish glutathione conjugation from other phase II...