Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

11:54
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
Published on: May 8, 2021
5.2K
A Novel Switching-Based Control Framework for Improved Task Performance in Teleoperation System With Asymmetric
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
|January 24, 2017
Summary
This study introduces a novel adaptive control framework for teleoperation systems, ensuring precise robot synchronization despite unknown dynamics and time delays. The new method guarantees superior transient and steady-state performance for both master and slave robots.
Area of Science:
- Robotics
- Control Systems Engineering
- Mechatronics
Background:
- Teleoperation systems require precise synchronization between master and slave robots.
- Challenges include unknown robot kinematics/dynamics and asymmetric time delays.
- Existing methods struggle to address these issues simultaneously with performance constraints.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an adaptive control framework for task-space teleoperation.
- To address constrained, predefined synchronization errors.
- To handle unknown system parameters and time-varying delays within a unified approach.
Main Methods:
- A novel switched control framework is proposed.
- Stability is established using multiple Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals.
- The controller is designed to guarantee prescribed performance.
Main Results:
- The closed-loop system stability is proven in the sense of state-independent input-to-output stability.
- The controller effectively manages unknown kinematics/dynamics and asymmetric time delays.
- Prescribed transient-state and steady-state synchronization performances are achieved.
Conclusions:
- The developed adaptive control framework offers a unified solution for complex teleoperation challenges.
- It ensures robust and precise synchronization performance.
- Simulation studies validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Related Concept Videos
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
426
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
426
Controller Configurations
418
Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...
418
Feedback control systems
755
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
755
Open and closed-loop control systems
1.9K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
1.9K
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control
491
Phase-lead controllers are commonly used in various control systems to enhance response speed and stability. Adjusting the brightness on a television screen offers a practical example of phase-lead control. When contrast is enhanced, a phase-lead controller is employed. Mathematically, phase-lead control is identified when the first parameter is smaller than the second.
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
491
Transfer Function in Control Systems
1.8K
The transfer function is a fundamental concept in the analysis and design of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. It offers a concise way to understand how a system responds to different inputs in the frequency domain. It serves as a bridge between the time-domain differential equations that describe system dynamics and the frequency-domain representation that facilitates easier manipulation and analysis.
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...
1.8K

