Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Proton therapy range uncertainty reduction using vendor-agnostic tissue characterization on a virtual photon-counting CT head scan.

Medical physics·2026

Same author

Optimizing energy settings in CdTe, CZT, and Si photon-counting CT for material separation and detection.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026

Same author

Precise Lung Density Quantification with a Physics-based CT Harmonizer.

Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging·2026

Same author

Demographic distribution matching between real-world and virtual phantom population.

Medical physics·2026

Same author

Utility of the virtual imaging trials methodology for objective characterization of AI systems and training data.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026

Same author

Truth-based physics informed estimation of material composition in spectral CT in terms of density and effective atomic number.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026

Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

Size-specific optimization of CT protocols based on minimum detectability.

Yakun Zhang¹, Christopher Smitherman², Ehsan Samei^1,2,3

¹Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Catolina, 27705, USA.

Medical Physics

|January 26, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new platform optimizes CT protocols by modeling lesion detectability, balancing radiation dose and image quality. This tool helps improve dose efficiency and consistency across different patient sizes and scanners.

Keywords:

CT protocol optimization GUI detectability image quality size-specific protocol optimization task based performance

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals

Published on: November 15, 2024

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Published on: July 17, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals

Published on: November 15, 2024

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Published on: July 17, 2012

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Radiology
Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

Optimizing CT protocols is crucial for balancing diagnostic image quality with radiation dose.
Existing methods often lack a comprehensive, task-based approach across diverse clinical settings.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a comprehensive model for task-based CT performance.
To optimize radiation dose and image quality across a wide range of CT protocols in a multi-vendor environment.

Main Methods:

Eighty CT protocols were grouped, and phantoms were imaged across dose levels on two CT platforms.
Task-based image quality metrics (TTF, NPS) were extracted and combined with lesion models.
A GUI was developed to predict lesion detectability (Az) as a function of various parameters.

Main Results:

The GUI predicts lesion detectability (Az) based on lesion size/contrast, dose, and patient size.
Example: For a 5-mm/50-HU lesion, dose requirements varied with patient size (25-35 cm).
Example: At a constant patient size, lesion detectability improved with increased dose.

Conclusions:

A CT protocol optimization platform was developed using task-based detectability.
The platform visualizes the dose-image quality tradeoff.
It enhances protocol dose efficiency and consistency across patient sizes and scanners.