Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Noninvasive and Invasive Renal Hypoxia Monitoring in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: October 28, 2022
Identifying augmented renal clearance in trauma patients: Validation of the Augmented Renal Clearance in Trauma
Jeffrey F Barletta1, Alicia J Mangram, Marilyn Byrne
1From the Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University, College of Pharmacy-Glendale (J.F.B.); Trauma Services and Acute Care Surgery, Honor Health- John C. Lincoln Medical Center (A.J.M., M.B., J.F.S., A.K.H., F.R.A-O., G.R.S) and Department of Emergency Medicine, Honor Health- John C. Lincoln Medical Center (M.H.); and Trauma Research (J.K.D.), Honor Health-John C. Lincoln Medical Center.
Background:
Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is common in trauma patients and associated with subtherapeutic antimicrobial concentrations. This study reported the incidence of ARC, identified ARC risk factors, and described a model to predict ARC (i.e., ARCTIC) that is specific to trauma patients.
Methods:
Consecutive trauma patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit between March 2015 and January 2016 and had a measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) were considered for inclusion. Patients were excluded if their serum creatinine (SCr) was greater than 1.3 mg/dL. ARC was defined as a measured CrCl of 130 mL/min or greater. Demographic and trauma-specific variables were then compared, and multivariate analysis was performed. Using these results, a weighted scoring system was constructed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. ARCTIC score cutoffs were chosen based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The derived scoring system was then compared to a previously published scoring system for accuracy.
Results:
There were 133 patients with a mean age of 48 ± 19 years and SCr of 0.8 ± 0.2 mg/dL. The mean measured CrCl was 168 ± 65 mL/min, and the incidence of ARC was 67%. Multivariate analysis revealed the following risk factors for ARC (age, <56: odds ratios [OR], 58.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-658.9; age, 56 to 75: OR, 13.5; 95% CI, 1.2-151.7), SCr less than 0.7 mg/dL (OR, 12.5; 95% CI, 3-52.6), and male sex (OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 1.9-24.9). Using these results, the ARCTIC scoring system was: 4 points if younger than 56 years, 3 points if aged 56 years to 75 years, 3 points if SCr less than 0.7 mg/dL, and 2 points if male sex. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area (95% CI) of 0.813 (0.735-0.892) (p < 0.001). An ARCTIC score of 6 or higher had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 0.843, 0.682, 0.843, and 0.682, respectively.
Conclusion:
The incidence of ARC in trauma patients is high. The ARCTIC score represents a practical, pragmatic system that can be easily applied at the bedside. An ARCTIC score of 6 or higher represents an appropriate cutoff to screen for ARC where antimicrobial adjustments should be considered.
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management

