Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
1.0K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

805
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
805

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying Hearing Difficulty Moments in Conversational Audio.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

SELECT-CT: Symptom Evaluation, Lesion Estimation, and Curated Triage to CT - A Simple Algorithm to Select the Right Patients for Emergent Code Stroke CT.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Biomarkers.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Non-RVU-Generating Clinical Activities, Their Composition and Influence on Productivity, and Reporting Burden in a Public Hospital Setting.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2025
Same author

Dynamic pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling angiography using a 3D-radial multi-spoke spoiled gradient-recalled sequence.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.9K

Prospective motion correction for 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling using an external optical tracking

Murat Aksoy1, Julian Maclaren1, Roland Bammer1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|February 1, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Optical motion correction using a camera significantly reduces head motion artifacts in brain MRI scans, improving image quality and revealing obscured pathologies. This real-time method offers superior results compared to traditional navigator-based approaches.

Keywords:
Arterial spin labelingOptical motion correctionProspective motion correction

More Related Videos

Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
10:25

Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation

Published on: September 2, 2025

586
Human Fetal Blood Flow Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Motion Compensation
06:56

Human Fetal Blood Flow Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Motion Compensation

Published on: January 7, 2021

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.9K
Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
10:25

Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation

Published on: September 2, 2025

586
Human Fetal Blood Flow Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Motion Compensation
06:56

Human Fetal Blood Flow Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Motion Compensation

Published on: January 7, 2021

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Medical Physics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Head motion is a significant challenge in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain studies, leading to artifacts that compromise image quality.
  • Existing methods like navigator-based approaches rely on MRI data, introducing latency and requiring scanner modifications.
  • Optical motion correction offers a promising alternative, operating independently of the MRI scanner for low-latency, real-time motion updates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the efficacy of prospective optical motion correction in mitigating head motion artifacts during 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (3D PCASL) MRI.
  • To compare the performance of real-time optical motion tracking against navigator-style correction methods, considering latency differences.

Main Methods:

  • An optical motion correction system with a single camera and forehead marker tracked motion at 60fps.
  • Real-time optical tracking data was used to prospectively update the scan plane during 3D PCASL acquisitions.
  • Navigator-style correction was simulated by applying updates only once per repetition time using the optical tracking data.

Main Results:

  • Optical motion correction resulted in superior image quality compared to uncorrected and navigator-style corrected images.
  • Standard deviations of cerebral blood flow (CBF) differences were lower with optical correction (11.09mL/100g/min continuous, 9.60mL/100g/min discrete) versus navigator-style (14.35mL/100g/min continuous, 12.04mL/100g/min discrete).
  • In a patient case, optical correction successfully revealed pathology obscured by head motion.

Conclusions:

  • Prospective optical motion correction effectively reduces artifacts in 3D PCASL MRI, enhancing image quality.
  • Optical correction demonstrates advantages over navigator-style approaches due to lower latency and independence from MRI hardware.
  • This technique holds potential for improving diagnostic accuracy in neuroimaging by overcoming motion-related limitations.