Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

687
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
687

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Procedures to Influence Levels of Questions Asked by Students.

The Journal of general psychology·2017
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Training Students to Utilize Adjunct Reading Aids.

John A Glover1, John W Zimmer1, Robert W Filbeck1

  • 1a The University of Nebraska , USA.

The Journal of General Psychology
|February 2, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Students trained to identify essay keywords with rapid feedback, with or without points, significantly improved objective-related content recall. This keyword identification training enhances learning outcomes.

More Related Videos

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.8K
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.8K
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Psychology
  • Learning Sciences
  • Academic Skills Development

Background:

  • Effective learning requires students to identify crucial information within academic texts.
  • Current pedagogical approaches may not adequately train students in pinpointing objective-relevant keywords.
  • Developing targeted strategies to improve keyword identification is essential for academic success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the efficacy of training students to identify keywords in essays pertinent to learning objectives.
  • To compare the impact of different feedback mechanisms (rapid feedback, points, or both) on keyword identification accuracy and content mastery.
  • To determine if keyword identification training influences the recall of objective-linked versus incidental content.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty student subjects were allocated to four experimental conditions: control, rapid feedback, rapid feedback plus course points, and points only.
  • Data were collected on correct keyword identification, extraneous keyword identification, and posttest scores for objective-linked and incidental content.
  • Statistical analyses were performed to compare performance across the four conditions.

Main Results:

  • Conditions involving rapid feedback (with or without points) significantly outperformed control and points-only conditions in correct keyword identification and objective-linked content recall.
  • No significant differences were found between the feedback and feedback-plus-points conditions on the measured variables.
  • Incidental content recall did not differ significantly across any of the experimental conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Rapid feedback is a key component in effectively training students to identify objective-relevant keywords in essays.
  • Integrating keyword identification training into coursework, particularly with feedback mechanisms, can enhance learning of targeted content.
  • The study highlights the importance of specific instructional strategies for improving students' ability to discern and utilize critical information.