Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A Standardized Procedure of Dressing Management for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Published on: March 14, 2025
Scald management protocols - outcome differences in two different time periods using different treatment strategies
M Elmasry1, I Steinvall2, J Thorfinn2
1Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Burn Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping University,Sweden; Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Suez Canal University, Egypt.
Abstract:
Over the years the treatment of scalds in our centre has changed, moving more towards the use of biological dressings (xenografts). Management of scalds with mid dermal or deep dermal injuries differs among centers using different types of dressings, and recently biological membrane dressings were recommended for this type of injury. Here we describe differences in treatment outcome in different periods of time. All patients with scalds who presented to the Linkoping Burn Centre during two periods, early (1997-98) and later (2010-12) were included. Data were collected in the unit database and analyzed retrospectively. A lower proportion of autograft operations was found in the later period, falling from 32% to 19%. Hospital stay was shorter in the later period (3.5 days shorter, p=0.01) and adjusted duration of hospital stay/TBSA% was shorter (1.2 to 0.7, p=0.07). The two study groups were similar in most of the studied variables: we could not report any significant differences regarding outcome except for unadjusted duration of hospital stay. Further studies are required to investigate functional and aesthetic outcome differences between the treatment modalities.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

