Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
06:31
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
7.8K
Can Spatiotemporal Fluoride (18F-) Uptake be Used to Assess Bone Formation in the Tibia? A Longitudinal Study Using
Henrik Lundblad1, Charlotte Karlsson-Thur1, Gerald Q Maguire2
1Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|February 3, 2017
Summary
Fluoride (18F-) PET/CT bone scans show promise in assessing bone healing progress, particularly in complex tibia conditions. Visualizing 18F- uptake helps identify poor healing, though semiquantification remains ambiguous.
Area of Science:
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Bone healing assessment is crucial for orthopedic surgeons.
- Fluoride (18F-) ion imaging with PET/CT is gaining traction for evaluating bone conditions.
- 18F- uptake reflects local bone physiological activity, indicating healing or lack thereof.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if videos of spatiotemporal 18F- uptake via PET bone scans can identify problematic bone healing in complex tibia cases.
- To assess if semiquantification of radionuclide uptake correlates with bone healing progress.
Main Methods:
- Investigated tibia bone formation in patients with complex fractures, osteomyelitis, and osteotomies using 18F- PET/CT.
- Compared clinical healing with spatiotemporal 18F- uptake and standardized uptake value (SUV).
- Utilized spatially registered CT/PET data for qualitative video reconstruction and quantitative SUVmean/SUVmax calculations (SUVmeanDPD, SUVmaxDPD).
Main Results:
- Visual assessment of 18F- uptake identified three patients with poor healing due to uneven radionuclide distribution.
- An SUVmaxDPD of 0.18 or greater indicated good bone formation progress in 10 patients, verified by shorter TSF treatment duration.
- Semiquantification values (SUVmaxDPD) were ambiguous in 11 patients who achieved successful completion.
Conclusions:
- Spatiotemporal 18F- uptake visualization is a promising method for assessing bone formation progress.
- Uneven or very low 18F- uptake may indicate impaired bone healing, necessitating early intervention.
- Current semiquantification methods (SUVmaxDPD, SUVmeanDPD) showed ambiguity in correlating with bone healing progress.

