Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

15.3K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.3K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.7K
3.7K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.9K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.9K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

11.2K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
11.2K
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot01:07

End Point Prediction: Gran Plot

1.3K
A Gran plot is used to predict the equivalence volume or endpoint of a potentiometric or acid-base titration without reaching the endpoint. Typically, titration data is collected as a function of the titrant's volume up to a point less than the equivalence volume and then transformed into a linear format. The straight line is extended to the x-axis, indicating the necessary titrant volume to achieve the equivalence point.
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emulated trial of artificial intelligence use and subsequent depressive outcomes in a survey of US adults.

BMJ mental health·2026
Same author

Injury-induced Cxcl11 and neutrophil signaling drive zebrafish kidney regeneration by generating a nephrogenic niche of Fgf and Wnt expression.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

How deceptive online networks reached millions in the US 2020 elections.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

The effects of political advertising on Facebook and Instagram before the 2020 US election.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Sociodemographic disparities, healthcare system trust, and social support in mental health treatment among U.S. adults with depressive or anxiety symptoms.

Journal of mood and anxiety disorders·2026
Same author

Generative AI Use and Depressive Symptoms Among US Adults.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

A native sulfur deposit in Gale crater, Mars.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Coordinated demise of harmful algal blooms.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Genetic effects put into context.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Bacteria share proteins to survive antibiotics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Impacts shaped Earth's first continents.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Erratum for the Report "Covalently bonded single-molecule junctions with stable and reversible photoswitched conductivity" by C. Jia <i>et al</i>.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Improving election prediction internationally.

Ryan Kennedy1, Stefan Wojcik2,3, David Lazer2,3

  • 1Center for International and Comparative Studies, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. rkennedy@uh.edu.

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|February 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Global election prediction models accurately forecast outcomes in 80-90% of cases. Political institutions, incumbent advantage, and international factors significantly influence election results, with polling data proving a robust predictor.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Political Science
  • Computational Social Science
  • International Relations

Background:

  • Predicting election outcomes is crucial for understanding democratic processes.
  • Previous models often lacked global scope or comprehensive data.
  • The impact of various factors on direct executive elections requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate models for predicting direct executive elections globally.
  • To identify key predictors of election outcomes across diverse countries.
  • To assess the role of polling data in election forecasting.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a multiyear dataset of over 500 elections from 86 countries.
  • Employed a separate dataset with extensive polling data from 146 election rounds.
  • Validated models through out-of-sample testing and live forecasting experiments.

Main Results:

  • Models achieved 80-90% accuracy in predicting election outcomes.
  • Political institutions, incumbent advantage, and international linkage/aid were significant predictors.
  • Economic indicators showed relatively weak predictive power.
  • Global polling data demonstrated robustness as a predictor, even in developing nations.

Conclusions:

  • Global elections can be successfully modeled and are becoming more predictable.
  • Political institutions and incumbent advantage are strong determinants of election results.
  • International factors and polling data are vital for accurate election forecasting.