Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Digital PCR for Quantifying Circulating MicroRNAs in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: July 3, 2018
Clinical Outcomes according to the Achievement of Target Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol in Patients with Acute
Taehoon Ahn1, Soon Yong Suh1, Kyounghoon Lee1
1Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Insights
Achieving target low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels below 70 mg/dL after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) did not improve clinical outcomes. This large-scale Korean study found no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events between LDL-C achievers and non-achievers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Lipid Metabolism
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a critical cardiovascular event.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common treatment for AMI.
- The impact of achieving target low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels on AMI patient outcomes post-PCI is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether achieving a target LDL-C level (below 70 mg/dL) in AMI patients undergoing PCI is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
- To compare the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between patients who achieved target LDL-C and those who did not.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale, prospective, multicenter Korean Myocardial Infarction (KorMI) registry was utilized, enrolling 13473 AMI patients.
- Propensity score matching was applied to 1292 patients (646 LDL-C achievers vs. 646 non-achievers) to balance baseline characteristics.
- The primary endpoint was the composite of 1-year MACE, including cardiac death, recurrent MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and coronary artery bypass grafting.
Main Results:
- After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics were similar between the target LDL-C achiever and non-achiever groups.
- No significant differences were observed in the incidence of cardiac death (0.5% vs. 0.5%), recurrent MI (1.1% vs. 0.8%), TLR (5.0% vs. 4.5%), MACE (6.5% vs. 5.9%), or stent thrombosis (2.5% vs. 1.9%) between the groups.
- The p-values for all primary and secondary endpoints indicated no statistically significant differences.
Conclusions:
- Achievement of target LDL-C levels (below 70 mg/dL) in AMI patients undergoing PCI, as assessed by propensity score matching, did not lead to significantly better clinical outcomes.
- These findings suggest that simply reaching a specific LDL-C threshold may not be sufficient to improve major adverse cardiac events in this patient population.
- Further research may be needed to explore other factors influencing clinical outcomes in AMI patients post-PCI.
Background And Objectives:
The clinical outcome of patient with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with or without achievement of target low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), has little known information. This study investigated if target LDL-C level (below 70 mg/dL) achievements in patients with AMI showed better clinical outcomes or not.
Subjects And Methods:
Between May 2008 and September 2012, this study enrolled 13473 AMI patients in a large-scale, prospective, multicenter Korean Myocardial Infarction (KorMI) registry. 12720 patients survived and 6746 patients completed a 1-year clinical follow up. Among them 3315 patients received serial lipid profile follow-ups. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for differences in clinical baseline and angiographic characteristics, producing a total of 1292 patients (646 target LDL-C achievers vs. 646 non-achievers). The primary end point was the composite of a 1-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and coronary artery bypass grafting.
Results:
After propensity score matching, baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical outcomes of the propensity score matched patients who showed no significant differences in cardiac death (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p=1.000), recurrent MI (1.1% vs. 0.8%, p=0.562), TLR (5.0% vs. 4.5%, p=0.649), MACEs (6.5% vs. 5.9%, p=0.644) and stent thrombosis (2.5% vs. 1.9%, p=0.560).
Conclusion:
In this propensity-matched comparison, AMI patients undergoing PCI with a target LDL-C (below 70 mg/dL) achievement did not show better clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies