Related Experiment Videos
External fixation or a cast for Colles' fracture.
1Department of Orthopedics, Hillerød Hospital, Denmark.
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
|August 1, 1989
Summary
External fixation for distal radius fractures improved wrist function and reduced displacement compared to casting. However, external fixation had more complications, like thumb sensory issues, which may be preventable with technique modifications.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Traumatology
- Radiology
Background:
- Distal radius fractures are common injuries.
- Treatment options include external fixation and cast immobilization.
- Long-term outcomes require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare functional and radiographic outcomes of external fixation versus cast immobilization for displaced distal radius fractures.
- To evaluate the incidence of arthrosis and complications between the two treatment groups.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study comparing 40 patients treated with external fixation and 91 patients treated with cast immobilization.
- Evaluation of wrist function and radiographic position at 2.5 years post-treatment.
- Assessment of complication rates, including sensory disturbances and arthrosis.
Main Results:
- External fixation resulted in better wrist function and less residual displacement compared to cast immobilization.
- No significant difference in the frequency of arthrosis between the groups.
- Higher complication rates were observed with external fixation, particularly sensory disturbances in the thumb.
Conclusions:
- External fixation offers functional advantages for distal radius fractures but is associated with increased complications.
- Modified surgical techniques for external fixation may mitigate complications like thumb sensory disturbances.
- Both methods showed similar rates of post-traumatic arthrosis.