Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standardization of Rn-222 at the Australian Radiation Laboratory.

T H Gan1, S B Solomon1, J R Peggie1

  • 1Australian Radiation Laboratory, Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, Victoria, 3085, Australia.

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
|February 10, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver.

EJNMMI research·2020
Same author

REASSESSMENT OF INHALATION DOSES TO WORKERS IN AUSTRALIAN SHOW CAVES.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2019
Same author

Temporal evaluation of the microwave ablation zone and comparison of CT and gross sizes during the first month post-ablation in swine lung.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2018
Same author

Assessment of automated cone-beam CT vessel identification software during transarterial hepatic embolisation: radiation dose, contrast medium volume, processing time, and operator perspectives compared to digital subtraction angiography.

Clinical radiology·2018
Same author

Microwave Ablation in the Management of Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastases.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2018
Same author

Irreversible electroporation and thermal ablation of tumors in the liver, lung, kidney and bone: What are the differences?

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2017
Same journal

Precise Numerical Differentiation of Thermodynamic Functions with Multicomplex Variables.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Characterization of 3-Dimensional Printing and Casting Materials for use in Computed Tomography and X-ray Imaging Phantoms.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

On The Quotient of a Centralized and a Non-centralized Complex Gaussian Random Variable.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Fast Methods for Finding Multiple Effective Influencers in Real Networks.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Disinfection of Respirators with Ultraviolet Radiation.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

DNA Origami Design: A How-To Tutorial.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
See all related articles

Standardizing radon-222 (Rn-222) involved calibrating scintillation cells using two methods traceable to NIST standards. Both methods yielded similar results, with uncertainty reduced to 1.8% using improved calibration factors.

Area of Science:

  • Radiochemistry
  • Metrology
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of radon-222 (Rn-222) is crucial for radiation safety and environmental monitoring.
  • Standardization of Rn-222 requires reliable calibration methods for detection equipment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare two methods for standardizing Rn-222 at the Australian Radiation Laboratory.
  • To assess and reduce the uncertainty in Rn-222 calibration.

Main Methods:

  • Calibration of scintillation cells using standard Radium-226 (Ra-226) solutions traceable to NIST.
  • Employing two Rn-222 transfer methods: direct injection and volumetric sampling.
  • Comparing results and uncertainties between the injection and volumetric methods.
Keywords:
Rn-222 calibrationscintillation celluncertainty components

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both the injection and volumetric methods produced comparable Rn-222 calibration results.
  • Initial random uncertainty was 3.4% (one standard deviation).
  • Improved calibration factors reduced the overall random uncertainty to 1.8% (one standard deviation).

Conclusions:

  • The injection and volumetric methods are suitable for Rn-222 standardization.
  • Enhanced calibration factor accuracy significantly improves measurement precision.
  • The study contributes to reliable Rn-222 metrology.