Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

1.5K
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
1.5K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

557
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
557
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

18.4K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
18.4K
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

1.1K
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
1.1K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

17.9K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.9K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk, time, and psychological distance: Does construal level theory capture the impact of delay on risk preference?

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024
Same author

Violations of transitive preference: A comparison of compensatory and noncompensatory accounts.

Psychological review·2024
Same author

Fenneman et al.'s (2022) review of formal impulsivity models: Implications for theory and measures of impulsivity.

Psychological bulletin·2023
Same author

The Future of Decisions From Experience: Connecting Real-World Decision Problems to Cognitive Processes.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023
Same author

The effect of incentivization on the conjunction fallacy in judgments: a meta-analysis.

Psychological research·2023
Same author

A systematic investigation into the reliability of inter-temporal choice model parameters.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same journal

A longitudinal study on the intergenerational transmission mechanism of music preference on adolescents' emotion regulation.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

A cross-cultural adaptation and content validity assessment of the Czech Version Kiddy-KINDL Questionnaire.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Relationship between playing golf and cognitive function in old age.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Chatbot language style matching and reuse intention in service failure: A communication accommodation theory explanation.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Reactive stress tolerance and reaction speed in the adaptive determination test as predictors of cadets' combat training performance.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

CSR disclosure authenticity in food companies: The moderating effect of consumer attribution tendencies on trust formation and reputation enhancement pathways.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K

Choice in experiential learning: True preferences or experimental artifacts?

Nathaniel J S Ashby1, Emmanouil Konstantinidis2, Eldad Yechiam1

  • 1Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Israel.

Acta Psychologica
|February 13, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found that choice variance in decisions-from-feedback tasks stems from uncertainty about the best option, not exploration or pattern-seeking. This validates the paradigm for measuring learned preferences.

Keywords:
ConfidenceDecisions-from-feedbackLearningPreferenceUncertainty

More Related Videos

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

3.0K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K
Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

3.0K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • The decisions-from-feedback paradigm measures preferences from experiential learning.
  • Choice variance persists even with static options and fixed rewards, suggesting underlying factors beyond simple learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether choice variance in decisions-from-feedback tasks arises from continued exploration or exploitation of perceived patterns.
  • To assess the validity of the decisions-from-feedback paradigm as a method for measuring learned preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies utilized a decisions-from-feedback paradigm followed by a policy-setting task.
  • Choice variance and participants' confidence levels were analyzed in relation to their chosen policies.

Main Results:

  • Choice variance was proportional to the policies participants set, indicating a link between choice behavior and strategic decision-making.
  • In Study 2, under-confidence correlated with increased choice variance, suggesting uncertainty drives inconsistent choices.
  • Results indicate choice variance is better explained by a lack of confidence in option superiority rather than methodological artifacts.

Conclusions:

  • The decisions-from-feedback paradigm is a valid behavioral research method for assessing learned preferences.
  • Choice variance in this paradigm reflects uncertainty and confidence levels, not solely exploration or pattern exploitation.
  • Understanding choice variance is crucial for accurately interpreting learned preferences in decision-making research.