Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

03:55
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs
Published on: October 27, 2023
2.9K
Passive prosthetic hands and tools: A literature review
Bartjan Maat1, Gerwin Smit1, Dick Plettenburg1
1Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Prosthetics and Orthotics International
|February 14, 2017
Summary
Passive prostheses, including prosthetic hands and tools, are under-researched despite widespread use. This review highlights their utility and areas for improvement in pulling and grasping functions.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Engineering
- Prosthetics and Orthotics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Passive prostheses, encompassing prosthetic hands and tools, are categorized as static or adjustable.
- Despite significant use by individuals with limb deficiencies, passive prostheses have received limited research and development attention.
- A recent comprehensive review of the peer-reviewed literature on passive prostheses is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a thorough review of the existing peer-reviewed literature focusing on passive prostheses designed for hand replacement.
- To consolidate current knowledge regarding the users, applications, functionality, and limitations of passive prosthetic hands and tools.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature review was performed using four electronic databases.
- Relevant English-language articles were identified through a Boolean search strategy combining pertinent keywords.
- Thirty-eight papers were selected for inclusion in the final review.
Main Results:
- Publications on passive prosthetic hands detail user demographics, usage patterns, functional capabilities, and challenges in daily living activities.
- Research on prosthetic tools primarily addresses applications in sports, recreation, and vehicle operation.
- The review identified ambiguous terminology for passive prostheses, causing classification confusion.
Conclusions:
- Passive hand prostheses are utilized by one in three individuals with limb deficiencies but receive disproportionately little research attention.
- Improvements in pulling and grasping functions are indicated as key areas for development in passive prostheses.
- A novel classification system for passive prostheses is proposed to address existing terminology ambiguities and enhance clinical relevance and acceptance.

