Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Counting cells can accurately predict small-molecule bioactivity benchmarks.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Molecular networking, conformal predictions and revised fingerprint-based models for discovering endocrine disruptors in mixtures.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Classification of industrial chemicals for respiratory chemosensory irritation using the TRPV1-expressing neuronal SH-SY5Y cell model and machine learning.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same author

Design and synthesis of a chemically diverse, lead-like DNA-encoded library from sequential amide coupling.

RSC medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

Synthesis and Inhibitory Assessment of ACE2 Inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2: An <i>In Silico</i> and <i>In Vitro</i> Study.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2025
Same author

Identification of nanomolar adenosine A<sub>2A</sub> receptor ligands using reinforcement learning and structure-based drug design.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Correction to "AstraMEV (AI-Guided Structural Assembly of Multi-Epitope Vaccines) Against Infectious Bronchitis Virus".

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

MolPy: A Large Language Model-Friendly Toolkit for Reactive Topology Editing in Polymer Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Molecular Mechanisms of KIT Receptor Dimerization and Oncogenic Activation Revealed by Multiscale Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Structural and Thermodynamic Discrimination between Agonists and Antagonists of Retinoic Acid Receptor γ and the Vitamin D Receptor.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

PACEff Builder: An Efficient Platform for Constructing PACE Hybrid-Resolution Models for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Aqueous Protein, Peptide Assembly, and Membrane Protein Systems.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

TransKla: A Local-Global Cross-Attention Based Transformer Approach for Prediction of Lysine Lactylation Sites.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.4K

Improving Screening Efficiency through Iterative Screening Using Docking and Conformal Prediction.

Fredrik Svensson1, Ulf Norinder2,3, Andreas Bender1

  • 1Centre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge , Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|February 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an iterative screening method combining molecular docking and conformal prediction for drug discovery. This approach significantly improves efficiency by identifying active compounds while screening a smaller database portion.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.8K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.4K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.8K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • High-throughput screening (HTS) is a standard but costly drug discovery method.
  • Current HTS methods demand significant time, effort, and resources.
  • There is a need for more efficient screening strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an improved iterative screening process for drug discovery.
  • To reduce the cost and time associated with identifying active compounds.
  • To enhance the hit rate compared to traditional docking methods.

Main Methods:

  • Employing an iterative screening process starting with molecular docking.
  • Utilizing conformal prediction to classify remaining compounds based on initial screening results.
  • Retrospective validation using 41 targets from the Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E) dataset.

Main Results:

  • Successfully identified 57% of remaining active compounds while screening only 9.4% of the database.
  • Achieved an overall hit rate of 7.6%, surpassing docking alone (5.2%).
  • Identified 39.6% of active compounds within the top-scored docking compounds, outperforming docking-only screening (13.5%).

Conclusions:

  • Iterative screening integrating molecular docking and conformal prediction offers enhanced efficiency in drug discovery.
  • This method allows for the identification of active compounds with reduced screening volumes.
  • Conformal predictors provide guidance for optimizing subsequent screening iterations.