Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Stress Distribution under Commercial Denture Liners- A Finite Element and Clinical Analysis
Rahul Shrivastava1, Saurabh Chaturvedi2, Ashok Kumar Verma3
1Clinical Practitioner, Dental Care Oral Implantology Center and Axiss Dental Pvt., Ltd. , DLF Phase 1, Gurugram, Haryana, India .
Introduction:
Previous studies have shown that 20-30% of denture users have been dissatisfied with their dentures.
Aim:
To evaluate the stress pattern under elastic and viscoelastic denture liners using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and its clinical correlation using a questionnaire.
Materials And Methods:
The study had both in-vitro and in-vivo phases. In in-vitro phase fabrication of a virtual parametric model of edentulous maxilla and dentures with overlying mucosa was made. A virtual load of 166N was analyzed at three points (Point A=anterior ridge, Point B=right posterior ridge and Point C=left posterior ridge). For the in-vivo phase, 20 edentulous patients were provided conventional complete dentures (Group-I). The dentures were lined with silicone (elastic) liners (Group-II) and acrylic resins (viscoelastic) liners (Group-III) at regular (2 months) intervals. After each reline, the patients were evaluated using food eating ability and denture assessment questionnaires. The results were statistically analyzed. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 15.0 statistical analysis software. Other than standard statistical test Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Post-Hoc tests (Tukey-HSD) were used.
Results:
At loading, the in-vitro result for Groups-II and III revealed pressures of 0.074231N and 0.0678364N at Point A, 0.098764N and 0.093642N at Point B, and 0.099876N and 0.093746N at Point C respectively. The in-vivo study revealed that the mean quality of life score for different groups ranged from 23.65±4.00 (Group I) to 33.10±6.15 (Group III). The mean quality of life score for Group II was 29.50±5.08.
Conclusion:
The viscoelastic liner provided the most uniform stress distribution and performed better than an elastic liner with hard, firm and soft foods.
More Related Videos
07:16Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
11:28A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Stress Concentrations
The stress...
Stress Concentrations
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Residual Stresses in Bending
Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials