Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology01:59

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

22.0K
Crop cultivation has a long history in human civilization, with records showing the cultivation of cereal plants beginning at around 8000 BC. This early plant breeding was developed primarily to provide a steady supply of food.
22.0K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

240.4K
Overview
240.4K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

82.1K
Overview
82.1K
Trihybrid Crosses02:27

Trihybrid Crosses

26.4K
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
26.4K
Transgenic Plants02:50

Transgenic Plants

8.9K
Recombinant DNA technology called transgenesis is often used to add a foreign gene or remove a detrimental gene from an organism. Such genetically modified organisms are called transgenic organisms.
The first-ever transgenic plant was a tobacco plant developed in 1983 that showed resistance against the tobacco mosaic virus. Since then, many transgenic plants have been developed and commercialized for improving the agricultural, ornamental, and horticultural value of a crop plant. Transgenic...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rodent and broiler feeding studies with maize containing genetically modified event DP-915635-4 show no adverse effects on health or performance.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2024
Same author

Amino Acid Digestibility of Different Formulations of Torula Yeast in an In Vitro Porcine Gastrointestinal Digestion Model and Their Protective Effects on Barrier Function and Inflammation in a Caco-2/THP1Co-Culture Model.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2023
Same author

Protein familiarity is a fundamental but rarely operationalized concept in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: example of phosphomannose isomerase (PMI).

Transgenic research·2023
Same author

Non-seed plants are emerging gene sources for agriculture and insect control proteins.

The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology·2023
Same author

Genetically modified DP915635 maize is agronomically and compositionally comparable to non-genetically modified maize.

GM crops & food·2023
Same author

Simulated gastric fluid assay for estimating the digestibility of newly expressed proteins in GE crops: Missteps in development and interpretation.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Agrobacterium-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes
10:28

Agrobacterium-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes

Published on: February 14, 2020

25.1K

Stacking transgenic event DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 alters maize composition less than traditional breeding.

Rod A Herman1, Brandon J Fast1, Peter N Scherer1

  • 1Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Plant Biotechnology Journal
|February 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Genetically modified (GM) maize breeding stacks showed greater compositional similarity to near-isogenic hybrids than non-GM hybrids. Conventional breeding significantly impacts maize composition more than genetic modification.

Keywords:
breeding stackscompositionequivalence

More Related Videos

Scalable Transfection of Maize Mesophyll Protoplasts
08:38

Scalable Transfection of Maize Mesophyll Protoplasts

Published on: June 23, 2023

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits
09:43

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits

Published on: January 3, 2025

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Agrobacterium-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes
10:28

Agrobacterium-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes

Published on: February 14, 2020

25.1K
Scalable Transfection of Maize Mesophyll Protoplasts
08:38

Scalable Transfection of Maize Mesophyll Protoplasts

Published on: June 23, 2023

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits
09:43

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits

Published on: January 3, 2025

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Biochemistry
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Assessing the biochemical composition of genetically modified (GM) crops is crucial.
  • Understanding the impact of stacking multiple GM events on crop composition is essential for regulatory and breeding purposes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the impact of stacking GM events versus conventional breeding on maize-grain biochemical composition.
  • To evaluate the compositional similarity between GM stacks and their non-GM counterparts.

Main Methods:

  • Compared seven GM stacks (containing event DAS-Ø15Ø7-1) with matched non-GM near-isogenic hybrids (iso-hybrids).
  • Analyzed compositional similarity using scatter plots and calculated a coefficient of identity.
  • Compared GM stacks to iso-hybrids and non-GM hybrids to iso-hybrids.

Main Results:

  • GM breeding stacks were more compositionally similar to iso-hybrids than were non-GM hybrids.
  • Conventional breeding practices had a more substantial influence on maize composition than transgenesis or stacking of GM events.
  • The study questions the necessity of unique compositional studies for GM crops, particularly stacked events with prior normal compositional profiles.

Conclusions:

  • Transgenesis and stacking of GM events have a minimal impact on maize composition compared to conventional breeding.
  • Regulatory requirements for compositional studies of GM crops may need re-evaluation, especially for stacked events.
  • Non-GM breeding is a stronger driver of compositional variation in maize than genetic modification.