Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Hemodynamic Precision in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit using Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography
Published on: January 27, 2023
The impact of a hyperdynamic left ventricle on right ventricular function measurements in preterm infants with a
Colm R Breatnach1, Orla Franklin2, Adam T James1
1Department of Neonatology, The Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Insights
A hyperdynamic left ventricle (LV) in premature infants with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) affects right ventricular (RV) function measurements. This study found that while RV displacement and velocity measures were unchanged, RV strain and area change were reduced in infants with PDA.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal cardiology
- Pediatric echocardiography
- Cardiovascular physiology
Background:
- Right ventricular (RV) function is crucial in premature infants, assessed via basal longitudinal strain (RV BLS), systolic tissue Doppler velocity (RV s'), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and fractional area change (FAC).
- A hyperdynamic left ventricle (LV) may confound RV displacement (TAPSE) and velocity (RV s') measurements, but not relative strain (RV BLS) or area (FAC) changes.
- Investigating this hypothesis in preterm infants with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is essential for accurate functional assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the influence of a hyperdynamic left ventricle (LV) on various right ventricular (RV) functional parameters in preterm infants with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).
- To determine if specific RV measures are more susceptible to LV effects in this vulnerable population.
Main Methods:
- Echocardiographic measurements of LV and RV function (LV EF, RV BLS, RV s', TAPSE, FAC) were performed on preterm infants (<29 weeks) on days 1, 2, and 5-7.
- Infants were grouped based on the presence or absence of a PDA by days 5-7.
- Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare LV and RV function between groups.
Main Results:
- Of 121 infants enrolled, 83 (69%) had a persistent PDA by days 5-7, exhibiting hyperdynamic LV function.
- No significant differences in RV s' or TAPSE were observed between infants with and without PDA.
- Infants with PDA showed significantly lower RV FAC and RV BLS compared to those without PDA.
Conclusions:
- The hyperdynamic left ventricle associated with PDA in preterm infants impacts RV fractional area change and basal longitudinal strain.
- These findings highlight the need to consider LV influence when interpreting RV functional parameters, particularly FAC and BLS, in preterm neonates with PDA.
- Accurate RV assessment in neonates requires accounting for the complex interplay between LV and RV function.
Background And Aims:
Right ventricular (RV) functional assessment in premature infants includes basal longitudinal strain (RV BLS), RV systolic tissue Doppler velocity (RV s'), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and RV fractional area change (FAC). A hyperdynamic left ventricle (LV) may influence RV measures of displacement (TAPSE) and velocity (RV s') but not measures of relative change of length (RV BLS) or area (FAC). We aimed to explore this hypothesis in preterm infants with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).
Methods:
We measured LV function (ejection fraction (LV EF); left ventricular output) and RV function (RV BLS; RV s'; TAPSE; FAC) on days 1, 2 and 5-7 in infants <29 weeks. The cohort was divided based on PDA presence by days 5-7. LV and RV function measurements were compared between the groups using two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures.
Results:
121 infants with a mean (SD) gestation and birth weight of 26.8 (1.4) weeks and 968 (250) g were enrolled. By days 5-7, the PDA remained open in 83 (69%), with evidence of hyperdynamic LV function. There was no difference in RV s' (5.3 (0.9) vs 5.1 (1.0) cm/s, p=0.3) or TAPSE (6.2 (1.3) vs 6.1 (1.2) mm, p=0.7) between infants with and without a PDA, but infants in the PDA group had lower RV FAC (41 (8) vs 47 (10) %, p<0.01) and lower RV BLS (-24.2 (5.0) vs -26.2 (4.1) %, p=0.03).
Conclusions:
LV influence on RV functional parameters must be taken into account when interpreting of RV function using those techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

