Effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: A 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Pilot In Vitro Study to Assess Cleaning Ability and Effects of Different Decontamination Methods on Implant Surfaces
Published on: November 21, 2025
Morgana Favetti1, Thaiane Schroeder1, Anelise Fernandes Montagner2
1Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
Objectives:
This study evaluated the effect of the pre-treatment with 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) as coadjutant in restoration retention of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL), after 36 months of follow-up.
Methods:
A randomized controlled split-mouth and triple-blind (operators, patients and evaluator) trial was carried out. Patients (n=42) with at least two non-carious cervical lesions were included. The teeth with NCCL were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: application of 2% CHX (experimental group) or a placebo solution (control group) for 60s after acid etching and before the adhesive application. A trained and calibrated examiner evaluated the restorations at baseline (1 week) and at each recall (6, 12, 24 and 36 months) using the FDI criteria. A total of 225 restorations were evaluated after 36-month follow-up. Data were subjected to survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to evaluate the existence of differences between the survival curves (α=0.05).
Results:
The restorations survival rate after 36 months of follow-up was 76.1%. There was no difference in the retention and failure rates between the experimental and the control group (p=0.968). There was an increased failure trend when restorations were located subgingival compared to those at the gingival level or supragingival.
Conclusion:
The pre-treatment with 2% chlorhexidine digluconate did not promote further restoration retention of noncarious cervical lesions.
Clinical Significance:
The cavity pre-treatment with chlorhexidine for inhibition of hybrid layer degradation does not add any beneficial effect to the clinical performance of restorations.
More Related Videos
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
03:07Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...